Fei Kong
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Fei Kong has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chenxi Yuan
New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, USA
1 shared publication - Hao Cheng
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)
1 shared publication - Tianlong Chen
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
1 shared publication - Xiaoshuang Shi
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (7) , 3140
Assessing Membership Inference Privacy Risks in Medical Diffusion Models via Discrete Encoding-Based Inference
The rapid adoption of diffusion models in medical imaging has raised significant concerns regarding data privacy, especially their susceptibility to Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs). However, the privacy risks associated with diffusion models in the medical domain remain underexplored compared to natural images. In this study, we propose a novel grey-box attack framework, termed the Discrete Encoding-Based Membership Inference Attack (DEB), inspired by Denoising Diffusion Codebook Models (DDCM). DEB injects semantically meaningful noise via a discrete codebook strategy and identifies training samples by analyzing the model’s output trajectory under this discrete encoding, specifically measuring the average of intermediate predictions across selected time steps. We conduct an evaluation of MIAs across natural images and five representative datasets from the MedMNIST collection. Our experiments reveal that the susceptibility of diffusion models is highly dependent on the data modality; for instance, while certain datasets exhibit near-complete vulnerability, others like PathMNIST demonstrate strong inherent resistance to MIAs. Furthermore, DEB demonstrates superior performance compared to existing baselines (e.g., SecMI, PIA, SimA), particularly on challenging datasets. For example, DEB achieves a True Positive Rate at 1% False Positive Rate (TPR @ 1% FPR) of 60.3% on CIFAR-10, significantly outperforming the SimA baseline (35.9%). Notably, even on the highly resistant PathMNIST dataset, DEB attains a 10.2% TPR @ 1% FPR, establishing a substantial advantage over the PIA baseline (1.1%). This work provides practical insights into the privacy risks inherent in diffusion models and emphasizes that model providers should carefully assess these vulnerabilities when exposing intermediate generation APIs.
- 24 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (7) , 3140
Open AccessAssessing Membership Inference Privacy Risks in Medical Diffusion Models via Discrete Encoding-Based Inference
The rapid adoption of diffusion models in medical imaging has raised significant concerns regarding data privacy, especially their susceptibility to Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs). However, the privacy risks associated with diffusion models in the medical domain remain underexplored compared to natural images. In this study, we propose a novel grey-box attack framework, termed the Discrete Encoding-Based Membership Inference Attack (DEB), inspired by Denoising Diffusion Codebook Models (DDCM). DEB injects semantically meaningful noise via a discrete codebook strategy and identifies training samples by analyzing the model’s output trajectory under this discrete encoding, specifically measuring the average of intermediate predictions across selected time steps. We conduct an evaluation of MIAs across natural images and five representative datasets from the MedMNIST collection. Our experiments reveal that the susceptibility of diffusion models is highly dependent on the data modality; for instance, while certain datasets exhibit near-complete vulnerability, others like PathMNIST demonstrate strong inherent resistance to MIAs. Furthermore, DEB demonstrates superior performance compared to existing baselines (e.g., SecMI, PIA, SimA), particularly on challenging datasets. For example, DEB achieves a True Positive Rate at 1% False Positive Rate (TPR @ 1% FPR) of 60.3% on CIFAR-10, significantly outperforming the SimA baseline (35.9%). Notably, even on the highly resistant PathMNIST dataset, DEB attains a 10.2% TPR @ 1% FPR, establishing a substantial advantage over the PIA baseline (1.1%). This work provides practical insights into the privacy risks inherent in diffusion models and emphasizes that model providers should carefully assess these vulnerabilities when exposing intermediate generation APIs.