Robby Kapikila
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Robby Kapikila has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bernard Phiri
Basic Science and Immunology Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
1 shared publication - Caroline Cleopatra Chisenga
Basic Sciences and Immunology, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
1 shared publication - Charlie Chaluma Luchen
Basic Sciences and Immunology, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
1 shared publication - Chikondi Sakala
Basic Science and Immunology Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
1 shared publication - David A. Sack
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health
1 shared publication - Dennis Ngosa
Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, Analysis Unit, Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 14 (2) , 420
Faecal Coliforms and Escherichia coli Contamination in Drinking Water Sources in Cholera Hotspot Areas of Lusaka District, Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Study
The October 2023 to 2024 cholera outbreak demonstrates significant challenges related to water quality and sanitation, especially in peri-urban areas with limited access to clean water. This study assesses the presence of faecal coliforms and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in drinking water sources across five townships, identified as cholera transmission hotspots, two months post the cholera outbreak in the Lusaka District. A total of 169 water samples were collected from protected sources, treated piped water, and unprotected sources, including dams and shallow wells. Faecal coliforms and E. coli were detected across all source types. Among unprotected sources, 92.3% (12/13) of samples contained ≥100 CFU/100 mL of both faecal coliforms and E. coli. Protected sources showed variable contamination, with 18.3% exceeding ≥100 CFU/100 mL for faecal coliforms and 15.4% for E. coli. Treated water sources showed the lowest contamination, with 88.5% of samples having no detectable faecal coliforms and 90.4% having no detectable E. coli. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression showed that treated water sources were associated with substantially lower faecal coliform counts compared with protected sources (PR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03–0.35), while unprotected sources exhibited higher contamination intensity (PR = 1.77, 95% CI: 0.94–3.31). Treated sources were significantly more likely to be structurally free of contamination, whereas unprotected sources had an extremely low probability of yielding zero counts. These findings indicate that current water safety conditions in Lusaka’s cholera hotspot areas remain inadequate for preventing faecal-oral transmission.
- 11 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 14 (2) , 420
Open AccessFaecal Coliforms and Escherichia coli Contamination in Drinking Water Sources in Cholera Hotspot Areas of Lusaka District, Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Study
The October 2023 to 2024 cholera outbreak demonstrates significant challenges related to water quality and sanitation, especially in peri-urban areas with limited access to clean water. This study assesses the presence of faecal coliforms and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in drinking water sources across five townships, identified as cholera transmission hotspots, two months post the cholera outbreak in the Lusaka District. A total of 169 water samples were collected from protected sources, treated piped water, and unprotected sources, including dams and shallow wells. Faecal coliforms and E. coli were detected across all source types. Among unprotected sources, 92.3% (12/13) of samples contained ≥100 CFU/100 mL of both faecal coliforms and E. coli. Protected sources showed variable contamination, with 18.3% exceeding ≥100 CFU/100 mL for faecal coliforms and 15.4% for E. coli. Treated water sources showed the lowest contamination, with 88.5% of samples having no detectable faecal coliforms and 90.4% having no detectable E. coli. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression showed that treated water sources were associated with substantially lower faecal coliform counts compared with protected sources (PR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03–0.35), while unprotected sources exhibited higher contamination intensity (PR = 1.77, 95% CI: 0.94–3.31). Treated sources were significantly more likely to be structurally free of contamination, whereas unprotected sources had an extremely low probability of yielding zero counts. These findings indicate that current water safety conditions in Lusaka’s cholera hotspot areas remain inadequate for preventing faecal-oral transmission.