Emily Belker
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Emily Belker has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bart Vrugt
Department of Pathology, Stadtspital Zürich, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Kati Kiil
Department of Pathology, Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
1 shared publication - Katrin Hornemann
Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
1 shared publication - Peter Johannes Wild
Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Neuropathology and Human Genetics, University Hospital Frankfurt,Goethe University Frankfurt,Frankfurt am Main,Germany, Germany
1 shared publication - Peter Kleine
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, 63069 Offenbach am Main, Germany
1 shared publication - Waldemar Schreiner
Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Impact of STAS on Lung Resections for Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis
Background: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) has been proposed as a histopathological marker of aggressive tumor biology in adenocarcinoma of the lung (ADCL). Its independent prognostic significance and clinical implications regarding surgical strategy remain controversial. This study evaluated clinicopathological correlates and the prognostic impact of STAS in a homogeneous cohort of resected ADCL. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients with primary ADCL resected between 2009 and 2018. STAS was classified as absent, low (1–4 clusters), or high (≥5) by an experienced pathologist. Associations between STAS and clinical, surgical, and pathological variables were tested with univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression. Results: STAS was present in 46% of tumors and was significantly associated with a higher pathological N category (pN0-pN3; p = 0.005), more advanced UICC stage (p = 0.049), lymphovascular invasion (LVI; p = 0.008), and perineural invasion (PnI; p = 0.012). In univariate survival analysis, patients with STAS had shorter OS than patients without STAS (p = 0.047). After limited resection, OS did not differ (p = 0.864), whereas after radical anatomical resection, patients with STAS showed reduced OS (p = 0.034). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, STAS did not retain independent prognostic significance. Conclusions: STAS is frequent in resected ADCL and correlates with adverse pathological features and reduced OS in univariate models. In multivariate analysis, STAS did not emerge as an independent prognostic factor. These findings support the interpretation of STAS as a marker of aggressive tumor biology rather than an independent determinant of prognosis or surgical decision-making.
Open AccessImpact of STAS on Lung Resections for Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis
Background: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) has been proposed as a histopathological marker of aggressive tumor biology in adenocarcinoma of the lung (ADCL). Its independent prognostic significance and clinical implications regarding surgical strategy remain controversial. This study evaluated clinicopathological correlates and the prognostic impact of STAS in a homogeneous cohort of resected ADCL. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients with primary ADCL resected between 2009 and 2018. STAS was classified as absent, low (1–4 clusters), or high (≥5) by an experienced pathologist. Associations between STAS and clinical, surgical, and pathological variables were tested with univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression. Results: STAS was present in 46% of tumors and was significantly associated with a higher pathological N category (pN0-pN3; p = 0.005), more advanced UICC stage (p = 0.049), lymphovascular invasion (LVI; p = 0.008), and perineural invasion (PnI; p = 0.012). In univariate survival analysis, patients with STAS had shorter OS than patients without STAS (p = 0.047). After limited resection, OS did not differ (p = 0.864), whereas after radical anatomical resection, patients with STAS showed reduced OS (p = 0.034). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, STAS did not retain independent prognostic significance. Conclusions: STAS is frequent in resected ADCL and correlates with adverse pathological features and reduced OS in univariate models. In multivariate analysis, STAS did not emerge as an independent prognostic factor. These findings support the interpretation of STAS as a marker of aggressive tumor biology rather than an independent determinant of prognosis or surgical decision-making.