Dennis Kotti
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Dennis Kotti has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Brent Thomas
Centre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
1 shared publication - Brian M. Musau
Kenya Snakebite Research and Intervention Centre, Kenya Institute of Primate Research, Ministry of Health, Karen, Nairobi P.O. Box 24481-00502, Kenya
1 shared publication - Caroline Wangari Ngugi
Department of Medical Microbiology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi P.O. Box 62000-00200, Kenya
1 shared publication - Cassandra Marie Modahl
Centre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
1 shared publication - Ezekiel Adino
Kenya Snakebite Research and Intervention Centre, Kenya Institute of Primate Research, Ministry of Health, Karen, Nairobi P.O. Box 24481-00502, Kenya
1 shared publication - Geoffrey Maranga
Kenya Snakebite Research and Intervention Centre, Kenya Institute of Primate Research, Ministry of Health, Karen, Nairobi P.O. Box 24481-00502, Kenya
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Establishing the Kenya National Antivenom Quality Control Laboratory: Preclinical Efficacy Results of Four Antivenoms Against Venoms from the “Big Five” Snake Species in Kenya
Antivenom administration is currently the only therapy for snakebite envenoming. However, in sub-Saharan Africa, inadequate quality control systems have led to deficits in the availability, accessibility, efficacy and safety of regionally available antivenoms, which, in turn, hinder snakebite treatment and management in the region. To address this impediment to snakebite treatment in Kenya, this study aimed to assess the preclinical neutralising potencies of four different antivenoms previously or currently available in Kenya (SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN, PANAF-PremiumTM and InoserpTM) against key snakes of medical importance in the region, towards establishing a national antivenom quality control laboratory. Venoms were extracted from the Kenyan “big five” medically important snake species: Naja ashei, Naja pallida, Naja nigricollis, Dendroaspis polylepis and Bitis arietans, and their lethal potencies were determined using a murine median lethal dose (LD50) assay. In vitro immunological assays (ELISAs and immunoblotting) and an established preclinical murine in vivo neutralisation assay (median effective dose [ED50]) were used to assess the immunoglobulin-binding and venom-neutralising efficacies of the test antivenoms. In vitro assays revealed high venom-binding titres of SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN and PANAF-PremiumTM, and reactivity to a wide range of venom proteins across the different snake venoms. Contrastingly, InoserpTM antivenom had low binding titres and poor reactivity to the snake venom proteins. These findings were aligned with the in vivo results, where SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN and PANAF-PremiumTM showed potent venom-neutralising efficacies against all the tested snake venoms, while InoserpTM had low potency and failed to neutralise the lethal effects of N. ashei, N. pallida and D. polylepis venoms at the manufacture-claimed doses. Based on these robust preclinical results, we conclude that SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN and PANAF-PremiumTM antivenoms offer considerable potential for the treatment of envenoming by diverse medically important snakes in Kenya. The observed deficiencies with the InoserpTM product highlight the importance of (i) robust, independent preclinical antivenom efficacy testing and (ii) the value of establishing a quality control laboratory to inform local regulatory and procurement decision making.
Open AccessEstablishing the Kenya National Antivenom Quality Control Laboratory: Preclinical Efficacy Results of Four Antivenoms Against Venoms from the “Big Five” Snake Species in Kenya
Antivenom administration is currently the only therapy for snakebite envenoming. However, in sub-Saharan Africa, inadequate quality control systems have led to deficits in the availability, accessibility, efficacy and safety of regionally available antivenoms, which, in turn, hinder snakebite treatment and management in the region. To address this impediment to snakebite treatment in Kenya, this study aimed to assess the preclinical neutralising potencies of four different antivenoms previously or currently available in Kenya (SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN, PANAF-PremiumTM and InoserpTM) against key snakes of medical importance in the region, towards establishing a national antivenom quality control laboratory. Venoms were extracted from the Kenyan “big five” medically important snake species: Naja ashei, Naja pallida, Naja nigricollis, Dendroaspis polylepis and Bitis arietans, and their lethal potencies were determined using a murine median lethal dose (LD50) assay. In vitro immunological assays (ELISAs and immunoblotting) and an established preclinical murine in vivo neutralisation assay (median effective dose [ED50]) were used to assess the immunoglobulin-binding and venom-neutralising efficacies of the test antivenoms. In vitro assays revealed high venom-binding titres of SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN and PANAF-PremiumTM, and reactivity to a wide range of venom proteins across the different snake venoms. Contrastingly, InoserpTM antivenom had low binding titres and poor reactivity to the snake venom proteins. These findings were aligned with the in vivo results, where SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN and PANAF-PremiumTM showed potent venom-neutralising efficacies against all the tested snake venoms, while InoserpTM had low potency and failed to neutralise the lethal effects of N. ashei, N. pallida and D. polylepis venoms at the manufacture-claimed doses. Based on these robust preclinical results, we conclude that SAIMR polyvalent, AFRIVEN and PANAF-PremiumTM antivenoms offer considerable potential for the treatment of envenoming by diverse medically important snakes in Kenya. The observed deficiencies with the InoserpTM product highlight the importance of (i) robust, independent preclinical antivenom efficacy testing and (ii) the value of establishing a quality control laboratory to inform local regulatory and procurement decision making.