Maila Ruggeri
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Maila Ruggeri has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alessandra Improta
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Azzurra Massimi
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication Emanuele Di Simone
1 shared publication- Emanuele Di Simone
Department of Medical, Movement and Wellbeing Sciences, Parthenope University of Naples, 80133 Naples, Italy
1 shared publication - Erika Renzi
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Fabio Fabbian
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Healthcare
- Vol. 14 (5) , 560
Social Determinants of Health Assessed Among Nurses: A KAP-Oriented Systematic Review Using the Dahlgren-Whitehead Rainbow Model
Background and Objectives: Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are factors that can contribute to health inequities. Improving the conditions in which people are born, grow, and live requires collaboration between professionals from different health sectors. Given their health and well-being-focused care, nurses are crucial to promoting health equity in the care they provide. Thus, their knowledge, attitudes, and actions—i.e., practice—(KAP) regarding SDoH could serve as a helpful starting point for promoting care that also focuses on non-medical factors. This study aims to map the SDoH assessed in the literature in relation to nurses’ and nursing students’ KAPs, using the Dahlgren–Whitehead Rainbow Model as a logical framework. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Records published until June 2024 were selected from primary studies involving nurses and nursing students, with no time limits. The assessed determinants were adapted and categorised according to the Rainbow Model Levels. Results: 22 results were eligible. The SDoH (in general), poverty, social justice, social gradient, social inclusion and exclusion, discrimination, diversity, equity and inequality, food insecurity and access to nutritious food, employment status, geographical isolation, healthcare services, housing difficulties, transportation, social support, individual lifestyle factors, and health literacy were assessed on KAPs. Conversely, health equity has been assessed just for knowledge and attitudes. Considering the latter level of the Rainbow Model and the relative categorisation of the results, age, sex, and constitutional factors were not examined in the studies included in this review. Conclusions: This review maps the most and least frequently assessed SDoH in relation to KAP. As nurses are essential to providing care that considers SDoH, improving health outcomes, and addressing health inequities, and advocating for community health, it would be valuable to enhance nursing education from baccalaureate through postgraduate courses. Moreover, a strong relationship with different healthcare professionals is needed.
- 24 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Healthcare
- Vol. 14 (5) , 560
Open AccessSocial Determinants of Health Assessed Among Nurses: A KAP-Oriented Systematic Review Using the Dahlgren-Whitehead Rainbow Model
Background and Objectives: Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are factors that can contribute to health inequities. Improving the conditions in which people are born, grow, and live requires collaboration between professionals from different health sectors. Given their health and well-being-focused care, nurses are crucial to promoting health equity in the care they provide. Thus, their knowledge, attitudes, and actions—i.e., practice—(KAP) regarding SDoH could serve as a helpful starting point for promoting care that also focuses on non-medical factors. This study aims to map the SDoH assessed in the literature in relation to nurses’ and nursing students’ KAPs, using the Dahlgren–Whitehead Rainbow Model as a logical framework. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Records published until June 2024 were selected from primary studies involving nurses and nursing students, with no time limits. The assessed determinants were adapted and categorised according to the Rainbow Model Levels. Results: 22 results were eligible. The SDoH (in general), poverty, social justice, social gradient, social inclusion and exclusion, discrimination, diversity, equity and inequality, food insecurity and access to nutritious food, employment status, geographical isolation, healthcare services, housing difficulties, transportation, social support, individual lifestyle factors, and health literacy were assessed on KAPs. Conversely, health equity has been assessed just for knowledge and attitudes. Considering the latter level of the Rainbow Model and the relative categorisation of the results, age, sex, and constitutional factors were not examined in the studies included in this review. Conclusions: This review maps the most and least frequently assessed SDoH in relation to KAP. As nurses are essential to providing care that considers SDoH, improving health outcomes, and addressing health inequities, and advocating for community health, it would be valuable to enhance nursing education from baccalaureate through postgraduate courses. Moreover, a strong relationship with different healthcare professionals is needed.
- Open Access
- 1 June 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics
- Vol. 69 (3) , 171-176
Multidimensional assessment using a modified S.Va.M.A scale, a pilot study in patients aged 65 or older
- 1 June 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics
- Vol. 69 (3) , 171-176
Open AccessMultidimensional assessment using a modified S.Va.M.A scale, a pilot study in patients aged 65 or older