Chaofan Hong
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Chaofan Hong has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dan Li
Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China
1 shared publication - Guangtao Xu
Key Lab of Guangdong for Utilization of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China
1 shared publication - Junliang Chen
Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
1 shared publication - Liusheng Han
School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
1 shared publication - Xingda Chen
Key Lab of Guangdong for Utilization of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China
1 shared publication - Xiong Du
College of Agronomy, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (5) , 686
Effects of Within-Canopy Leaf Trait Distribution on BRF, Vegetation Indices, and UAV Retrieval Accuracy in Litchi Orchards
The spatial heterogeneity of leaf traits within canopies is an important source of uncertainty in leaf parameter estimation from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery, especially in structurally complex orchards. In this study, we combined three-dimensional (3D) radiative transfer simulations with field measurements from litchi orchards to quantify bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) uncertainty under four leaf trait distribution patterns within the canopy. Whole-canopy leaf traits were represented using: (1) a homogeneous canopy (HC), (2) vertically divided canopy (VDC), (3) horizontally divided canopy (HDC), and (4) a canopy divided into nine sections (CD9s). Among the simplified schemes, HDC produced BRF values most consistent with the CD9s configuration, while the largest deviation between CD9s and HC was observed at 570 nm with a maximum BRF normalized difference of 65.29%. Relative contribution rate analysis based on the symmetric relative difference (SRD, %) showed that leaf trait distribution pattern dominated the variability of several VIs, including NDVI, NDRE, CCI, SIPI, LICI, and PVI. Meanwhile, other VIs (e.g., NIRv, SAVI, OSAVI and EVI) were more strongly influenced by illumination–viewing geometry. Using multiangle UAV multispectral data improved the estimation of proxy leaf chlorophyll content (LCC, max R2cv = 0.52), while nadir-only data yielded the best results for leaf nitrogen mass-based content (LNC, max R2cv = 0.41). These results emphasize that reliable UAV-based leaf trait retrieval is closely related to leaf trait distribution pattern within the canopy and its interaction with other factors (e.g., illumination–viewing geometry).
- 25 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (5) , 686
Open AccessEffects of Within-Canopy Leaf Trait Distribution on BRF, Vegetation Indices, and UAV Retrieval Accuracy in Litchi Orchards
The spatial heterogeneity of leaf traits within canopies is an important source of uncertainty in leaf parameter estimation from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery, especially in structurally complex orchards. In this study, we combined three-dimensional (3D) radiative transfer simulations with field measurements from litchi orchards to quantify bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) uncertainty under four leaf trait distribution patterns within the canopy. Whole-canopy leaf traits were represented using: (1) a homogeneous canopy (HC), (2) vertically divided canopy (VDC), (3) horizontally divided canopy (HDC), and (4) a canopy divided into nine sections (CD9s). Among the simplified schemes, HDC produced BRF values most consistent with the CD9s configuration, while the largest deviation between CD9s and HC was observed at 570 nm with a maximum BRF normalized difference of 65.29%. Relative contribution rate analysis based on the symmetric relative difference (SRD, %) showed that leaf trait distribution pattern dominated the variability of several VIs, including NDVI, NDRE, CCI, SIPI, LICI, and PVI. Meanwhile, other VIs (e.g., NIRv, SAVI, OSAVI and EVI) were more strongly influenced by illumination–viewing geometry. Using multiangle UAV multispectral data improved the estimation of proxy leaf chlorophyll content (LCC, max R2cv = 0.52), while nadir-only data yielded the best results for leaf nitrogen mass-based content (LNC, max R2cv = 0.41). These results emphasize that reliable UAV-based leaf trait retrieval is closely related to leaf trait distribution pattern within the canopy and its interaction with other factors (e.g., illumination–viewing geometry).