Lingfang Xu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Lingfang Xu has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aichang Ji
Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Immune Diseases and Gout & Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
1 shared publication - Changgui Li
Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Immune Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University , Qingdao
1 shared publication - Haibing Chen
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, China
1 shared publication Hui Zhang
Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Immune Diseases and Gout, Shandong Provincial Clinical Medical Center for Gout, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao China
1 shared publicationLe Yan
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China
1 shared publicationLidan Ma
Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Immune Diseases and Gout, Shandong Provincial Clinical Medical Center for Gout, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 March 2026
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatology
- Vol. 78 (8) , 1765-1775
A Metabolomic Signature Predicts Gout Flare Clinical Outcome Associated With Colchicine Prophylaxis
Objective: This study investigated that serum metabolomics, before urate‐lowering therapy (ULT) initiation, could serve as a biomarker for responsiveness to colchicine prophylaxis in patients with gout commencing treat‐to‐target ULT. Methods: We studied a multicenter prospective cohort (n = 409) initiating treat‐to‐target ULT plus colchicine prophylaxis. Untargeted metabolomics were measured at enrollment. We defined putative colchicine response or colchicine nonresponse as no flare or one or more flares, respectively, during six months after first colchicine dose. Cox regression and machine learning models defined the metabolomic signatures associated with reported flare activity on colchicine prophylaxis in the cohort. Results: In our cohort, 36.9% participants experienced at least one flare. Many inflammation‐related metabolites were differentially abundant in the recurrent flare group and correlated with recurrent flare risk. A significant association was found between a four‐metabolite risk score and gout flare activity (adjusted hazard ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24–4.59), independent of the adjusted clinical factors. The machine learning model, which incorporated the top‐ranked metabolites selected by multivariable methods with unbiased variable selection along with traditional clinical factors, reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.771 (95% CI 0.713–0.828) and 0.724 (95% CI 0.611–0.837) for predicting flare risk in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. Conclusion: Metabolomic profile–defined inflammation status was associated with gout flare outcomes in ULT initiators receiving colchicine prophylaxis. Identification of these novel metabolomic predictive signatures before ULT could potentially help optimize clinical decision‐making for flare prophylaxis colchicine dosing and duration in the first six months after initiation of treat‐to‐target ULT in gout. image
- 13 March 2026
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatology
- Vol. 78 (8) , 1765-1775
Open AccessA Metabolomic Signature Predicts Gout Flare Clinical Outcome Associated With Colchicine Prophylaxis
Objective: This study investigated that serum metabolomics, before urate‐lowering therapy (ULT) initiation, could serve as a biomarker for responsiveness to colchicine prophylaxis in patients with gout commencing treat‐to‐target ULT. Methods: We studied a multicenter prospective cohort (n = 409) initiating treat‐to‐target ULT plus colchicine prophylaxis. Untargeted metabolomics were measured at enrollment. We defined putative colchicine response or colchicine nonresponse as no flare or one or more flares, respectively, during six months after first colchicine dose. Cox regression and machine learning models defined the metabolomic signatures associated with reported flare activity on colchicine prophylaxis in the cohort. Results: In our cohort, 36.9% participants experienced at least one flare. Many inflammation‐related metabolites were differentially abundant in the recurrent flare group and correlated with recurrent flare risk. A significant association was found between a four‐metabolite risk score and gout flare activity (adjusted hazard ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24–4.59), independent of the adjusted clinical factors. The machine learning model, which incorporated the top‐ranked metabolites selected by multivariable methods with unbiased variable selection along with traditional clinical factors, reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.771 (95% CI 0.713–0.828) and 0.724 (95% CI 0.611–0.837) for predicting flare risk in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. Conclusion: Metabolomic profile–defined inflammation status was associated with gout flare outcomes in ULT initiators receiving colchicine prophylaxis. Identification of these novel metabolomic predictive signatures before ULT could potentially help optimize clinical decision‐making for flare prophylaxis colchicine dosing and duration in the first six months after initiation of treat‐to‐target ULT in gout. image