Longchi Xu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Longchi Xu has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Haoxu Guo
School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
1 shared publication - Mengren Deng
School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
1 shared publication - Weiqiang Zhou
School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
1 shared publication - Wenxin Jin
School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
1 shared publication - Xinyan Chen
South China University of Technology Architectural Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510640, China
1 shared publication - Yufei Wang
School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
The Physiological and Psychological Effects of the Built Environment: Research Progress and Implications
With accelerating urbanization and a global emphasis on quality of life, the effects of the built environment on individual physiological and psychological well-being have become a critical research focus. However, existing studies remain fragmented in terms of theoretical perspectives, spatial scales, and methodological approaches, and a comprehensive synthesis of the physiological and psychological effects of the built environment is still lacking. This review adopts an interdisciplinary approach, integrating architecture, urban planning, landscape architecture, geography, and psychology to systematically review the literature on the health impacts of the built environment. Its findings indicate that the scope of the built environment has expanded from natural settings to residential areas, streets, and public spaces. Research scales have progressed from macro-level districts to streets and public spaces and further to micro-level physical environments. The impacts have extended from emotional responses to broader health and well-being outcomes, with increasing attention being given to specific population groups. Technological advances have shifted research paradigms from traditional surveys to approaches incorporating big data, machine learning, virtual reality, and physiological monitoring, enabling more precise analyses of links between spatial perception and emotional responses. This review identifies gaps in interdisciplinary integration, long-term monitoring, and the consideration of individual differences, highlighting the need for future studies to integrate multimodal data with theory-informed practice to support more human-centered, health-promoting built environments.
Open AccessThe Physiological and Psychological Effects of the Built Environment: Research Progress and Implications
With accelerating urbanization and a global emphasis on quality of life, the effects of the built environment on individual physiological and psychological well-being have become a critical research focus. However, existing studies remain fragmented in terms of theoretical perspectives, spatial scales, and methodological approaches, and a comprehensive synthesis of the physiological and psychological effects of the built environment is still lacking. This review adopts an interdisciplinary approach, integrating architecture, urban planning, landscape architecture, geography, and psychology to systematically review the literature on the health impacts of the built environment. Its findings indicate that the scope of the built environment has expanded from natural settings to residential areas, streets, and public spaces. Research scales have progressed from macro-level districts to streets and public spaces and further to micro-level physical environments. The impacts have extended from emotional responses to broader health and well-being outcomes, with increasing attention being given to specific population groups. Technological advances have shifted research paradigms from traditional surveys to approaches incorporating big data, machine learning, virtual reality, and physiological monitoring, enabling more precise analyses of links between spatial perception and emotional responses. This review identifies gaps in interdisciplinary integration, long-term monitoring, and the consideration of individual differences, highlighting the need for future studies to integrate multimodal data with theory-informed practice to support more human-centered, health-promoting built environments.