Violeta García-Viñola

Violeta García-Viñola

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Violeta García-Viñola has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Albert Bordons

    Grup de Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d’Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, c/Marcel·lí Domingo s/n, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain

    1 shared publication
  • Cristina Reguant

    Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Grup de Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d’Enologia, c/ Marcel·lí Domingo 1, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain

    1 shared publication
  • Montse Poblet

    Grup Biotecnologia Microbiana dels Aliments (BMA), Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Facultat d’Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain

    1 shared publication
  • Nicolas Rozès

    Grup de Biotecnologia Microbiana dels Aliments, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d’Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/Marcel·lí Domingo s/n, 43007 Tarragona, Spain

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Fumaric Acid as an Alternative to Sulphur Dioxide in Conventional and Skin-Macerated White Winemaking

    by Violeta García-Viñola, Montserrat Poblet, Albert Bordons, Cristina Reguant, Nicolas Rozès

    The production of white-skin-macerated wines without sulphur dioxide (SO2) has increased in recent years, although it presents challenges such as uncontrolled alcoholic fermentation (AF) or malolactic fermentation (MLF) and the production of undesirable compounds. Fumaric acid (FA) is being explored as an alternative to SO2 due to its antimicrobial and acidifying properties. This study evaluated the effects of vinification type (white skin contact vs. conventional white wine) and different treatments: (i) control without additives, (ii) 0.6 g/L FA, and (iii) 40 mg/L SO2. After AF, MLF was conducted under three conditions: spontaneous fermentation and two inoculated trials with 106 cells/mL of Oenococcus oeni, one without lees and one with 1 g/L lees from AF. Yeast and lactic acid bacteria dynamics during AF were monitored, along with chemical composition, colour, and sensory characteristics of the wines. Results revealed that the development of AF and final wine compositions were influenced by the vinification type and treatment. During MLF, residual FA from the AF was able to delay its progress but was not sufficient to completely inhibit it. The sensory analysis did not reveal significant differences between treatments. Fumaric acid is a viable alternative to SO2 for managing MLF in high-pH white wines (including those with skin maceration), allowing for lower SO2 concentrations and enhanced freshness without impacting sensory quality.