Amalie Christine Bagger
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Amalie Christine Bagger has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Christine Erikstrup Hallgreen
Department of Pharmacy, Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science and Real‐World Studies University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
1 shared publication - Kirstine Lund Hansen
Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science, Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication - Mathias Møllebæk
Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science, Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication - Sarah Homewood
Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 17 December 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
- Vol. 60 (2) , 551-562
Digitalizing Risk Minimization Measures in EU: Explorative Co-design Workshops with Expert Stakeholders
Background Post-marketing risk minimization measures for medicines, e.g. package leaflets and patient cards, aim to ensure that patients and health care professionals receive timely and relevant medicines safety information. The use of digital technologies for risk minimization is emerging but still limited, despite being central in patients’ and healthcare professionals’ information access. There is currently limited high-level, strategic discussion about the digitalization of additional risk minimization measures. Objective To elicit key expert stakeholders’ future visions of digital risk minimization measures in the European Union and to explore possible policy and healthcare implications of future digital risk minimization technologies. Methods Co-design workshops were conducted in three EU member states with clinicians, industry representatives, regulators, health information technology developers, and legal experts. Workshop transcripts and visual products were analyzed thematically in two coding cycles. Results Digitalizing risk minimization measures will transform roles, responsibilities, and collaborations, as stakeholders revise their remits with digital strategies and forge new collaborations to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of new digital solutions. Success depends on revised implementation pathways that reflect patients’ and healthcare professionals’ digital access to medicines information and the diverse information ecosystems across the EU. Patients may gain new roles as active data subjects through remote monitoring, raising new ethical and legal considerations. Conclusion Digital risk minimization in the EU offers opportunities for timely, personalized interventions but presents challenges in implementation complexity, healthcare professionals’ workload, and patient ethics, warranting more focused policy deliberation and research on digital health.
- 17 December 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
- Vol. 60 (2) , 551-562
Digitalizing Risk Minimization Measures in EU: Explorative Co-design Workshops with Expert Stakeholders
Background Post-marketing risk minimization measures for medicines, e.g. package leaflets and patient cards, aim to ensure that patients and health care professionals receive timely and relevant medicines safety information. The use of digital technologies for risk minimization is emerging but still limited, despite being central in patients’ and healthcare professionals’ information access. There is currently limited high-level, strategic discussion about the digitalization of additional risk minimization measures. Objective To elicit key expert stakeholders’ future visions of digital risk minimization measures in the European Union and to explore possible policy and healthcare implications of future digital risk minimization technologies. Methods Co-design workshops were conducted in three EU member states with clinicians, industry representatives, regulators, health information technology developers, and legal experts. Workshop transcripts and visual products were analyzed thematically in two coding cycles. Results Digitalizing risk minimization measures will transform roles, responsibilities, and collaborations, as stakeholders revise their remits with digital strategies and forge new collaborations to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of new digital solutions. Success depends on revised implementation pathways that reflect patients’ and healthcare professionals’ digital access to medicines information and the diverse information ecosystems across the EU. Patients may gain new roles as active data subjects through remote monitoring, raising new ethical and legal considerations. Conclusion Digital risk minimization in the EU offers opportunities for timely, personalized interventions but presents challenges in implementation complexity, healthcare professionals’ workload, and patient ethics, warranting more focused policy deliberation and research on digital health.