Caitlin Kaczynski
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Caitlin Kaczynski has a total of 24 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexia Iasonos
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 4 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics New York, New York
5 shared publications - Aleya Lyn
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 7 Department of Nursing New York, New York
5 shared publications - Angela K. Green
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
5 shared publications - Britta Weigelt
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
5 shared publications - Carol Aghajanian
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
5 shared publications - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Clinical characteristics and prior treatments of study participants.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Clinical characteristics and prior treatments of study participants.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Exploratory analysis of the three components of the HRD score.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Exploratory analysis of the three components of the HRD score.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Comparison of HRD scores in primary vs. recurrent disease and untreated vs. previously treated disease.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Comparison of HRD scores in primary vs. recurrent disease and untreated vs. previously treated disease.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Representativeness of study participants.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Representativeness of study participants.
- 25 March 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 32 (12) , 2362-2371
A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Purpose: Copy number–high (CN-H)/p53-abnormal endometrial cancers are high-grade uterine malignancies characterized by TP53 mutations, copy-number alterations, mismatch repair proficiency (MMRp), and absence of POLE mutations. A subset may be homologous recombination deficient (HRD), potentially conferring sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We aimed to test the combination of PARP and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this subgroup, leveraging possible synergy from immune priming. Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of olaparib (300 mg orally twice daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) in patients with persistent or recurrent CN-H/p53-abnormal endometrial cancer. Eligible patients had p53-abnormal, MMRp, and POLE-negative disease and up to 3 prior lines of therapy. The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks. Results: Of the 25 patients evaluable for efficacy, 2 patients achieved a complete response, and 6 achieved a partial response, resulting in an ORR of 32% [90% one-sided confidence interval (CI), 19.6%–100%]. The median duration of response was 11.2 months (80% two-sided CI, 6.4–11.9). The median progression-free survival was 3.9 months (80% two-sided CI, 2.1–5.8), and the median overall survival was 16.5 months (80% two-sided CI, 9.6–23.6). No new safety signals were identified. Genomic analyses suggested that responders had a numerically higher frequency of HRD tumors than nonresponders (50% vs. 17%). Conclusions: The combination of olaparib plus pembrolizumab has promising activity with durable responses in patients with persistent or recurrent CN-H/p53-abnormal endometrial cancer. Molecular biomarkers may be helpful for patient selection in future studies of this combination.
- 25 March 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 32 (12) , 2362-2371
A Phase II Trial of Olaparib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Recurrent Copy Number–High/p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer
Purpose: Copy number–high (CN-H)/p53-abnormal endometrial cancers are high-grade uterine malignancies characterized by TP53 mutations, copy-number alterations, mismatch repair proficiency (MMRp), and absence of POLE mutations. A subset may be homologous recombination deficient (HRD), potentially conferring sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We aimed to test the combination of PARP and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this subgroup, leveraging possible synergy from immune priming. Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of olaparib (300 mg orally twice daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) in patients with persistent or recurrent CN-H/p53-abnormal endometrial cancer. Eligible patients had p53-abnormal, MMRp, and POLE-negative disease and up to 3 prior lines of therapy. The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks. Results: Of the 25 patients evaluable for efficacy, 2 patients achieved a complete response, and 6 achieved a partial response, resulting in an ORR of 32% [90% one-sided confidence interval (CI), 19.6%–100%]. The median duration of response was 11.2 months (80% two-sided CI, 6.4–11.9). The median progression-free survival was 3.9 months (80% two-sided CI, 2.1–5.8), and the median overall survival was 16.5 months (80% two-sided CI, 9.6–23.6). No new safety signals were identified. Genomic analyses suggested that responders had a numerically higher frequency of HRD tumors than nonresponders (50% vs. 17%). Conclusions: The combination of olaparib plus pembrolizumab has promising activity with durable responses in patients with persistent or recurrent CN-H/p53-abnormal endometrial cancer. Molecular biomarkers may be helpful for patient selection in future studies of this combination.