Gabriela Fricatel
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Gabriela Fricatel has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Cristina Cioti
Doctoral School of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania
3 shared publications - Oana Cristina Arghir
Doctoral School of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania
3 shared publications - Cristina Tocia
Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania
2 shared publications - Nejla Dervis
School of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 1 University Street, 900470 Constanta, Romania
2 shared publications - Denisa Gabriela Ion-Andrei
Doctoral School of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania
1 shared publication - Ioan Anton Arghir
Doctoral Medicine School of the Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (13) , 5063
Post-Tuberculosis Sequelae and Active Tuberculosis in Lung Cancer: Imaging Patterns and Clinical Associations—A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study
Background: Tuberculosis-related pulmonary changes may overlap radiologically and clinically with lung cancer, complicating diagnostic interpretation, staging, and therapeutic planning. This study evaluated the relationship between tuberculosis status, thoracic imaging patterns, and clinical characteristics in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2020 and December 2025 at the Clinical Pneumophtisiology Hospital, Constanța, Romania. A total of 620 patients with lung cancer were analyzed. Patients were classified into three groups: no tuberculosis, post-tuberculosis sequelae, and active tuberculosis. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, histopathological, functional, and radiological variables were assessed. Associations between tuberculosis status and imaging findings were evaluated using chi-square testing, effect-size analysis, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Post-tuberculosis sequelae were identified in 337 patients (54.4%), active tuberculosis in 51 patients (8.2%), and no tuberculosis-related disease in 232 patients (37.4%). Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological type, occurring in 359 patients (57.9%). Significant associations with tuberculosis status were observed for fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial changes, infectious-inflammatory changes, cavitary/destructive lesions, atelectatic/retractile changes, pulmonary opacities, pleural involvement, and mediastinal/hilar adenopathy. The strongest effects were found for fibrotic/interstitial changes, infectious-inflammatory changes, and cavitary/destructive lesions. In regression analysis, active tuberculosis was most strongly associated with infectious-inflammatory changes, cavitary lesions, pulmonary opacities, and fibrotic abnormalities, while post-tuberculosis sequelae were mainly associated with chronic fibrotic and structural pulmonary changes. Conclusions: Tuberculosis-related abnormalities frequently coexist with lung cancer and may mimic or obscure malignant findings. Recognition of these overlapping patterns is essential for accurate radiological interpretation and individualized clinical management.
- 29 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (13) , 5063
Open AccessPost-Tuberculosis Sequelae and Active Tuberculosis in Lung Cancer: Imaging Patterns and Clinical Associations—A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study
Background: Tuberculosis-related pulmonary changes may overlap radiologically and clinically with lung cancer, complicating diagnostic interpretation, staging, and therapeutic planning. This study evaluated the relationship between tuberculosis status, thoracic imaging patterns, and clinical characteristics in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2020 and December 2025 at the Clinical Pneumophtisiology Hospital, Constanța, Romania. A total of 620 patients with lung cancer were analyzed. Patients were classified into three groups: no tuberculosis, post-tuberculosis sequelae, and active tuberculosis. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, histopathological, functional, and radiological variables were assessed. Associations between tuberculosis status and imaging findings were evaluated using chi-square testing, effect-size analysis, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Post-tuberculosis sequelae were identified in 337 patients (54.4%), active tuberculosis in 51 patients (8.2%), and no tuberculosis-related disease in 232 patients (37.4%). Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological type, occurring in 359 patients (57.9%). Significant associations with tuberculosis status were observed for fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial changes, infectious-inflammatory changes, cavitary/destructive lesions, atelectatic/retractile changes, pulmonary opacities, pleural involvement, and mediastinal/hilar adenopathy. The strongest effects were found for fibrotic/interstitial changes, infectious-inflammatory changes, and cavitary/destructive lesions. In regression analysis, active tuberculosis was most strongly associated with infectious-inflammatory changes, cavitary lesions, pulmonary opacities, and fibrotic abnormalities, while post-tuberculosis sequelae were mainly associated with chronic fibrotic and structural pulmonary changes. Conclusions: Tuberculosis-related abnormalities frequently coexist with lung cancer and may mimic or obscure malignant findings. Recognition of these overlapping patterns is essential for accurate radiological interpretation and individualized clinical management.
- Open Access
Tuberculosis-Associated Scar Carcinoma in Lung Cancer: Clinicopathological and Radiological Features of a Fibrotic-Cavitary Phenotype in a Retrospective Observational Cohort
Background: Scar carcinoma represents a distinct subtype of lung malignancy developing in areas of chronic pulmonary fibrosis, inflammation, and structural remodeling, frequently associated with previous pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). The present study aimed to evaluate the radiological, clinical, inflammatory, and histopathological characteristics associated with the scar carcinoma phenotype in patients with lung cancer (LC) and previous TB-related pulmonary abnormalities. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study conducted between February 2020 and December 2025 included 844 patients diagnosed with lung cancer. The scar carcinoma phenotype was operationally defined by the coexistence of: (1) confirmed lung cancer, (2) post-tuberculous structural pulmonary abnormalities on thoracic imaging, and (3) clinical history compatible with prior pulmonary TB. Associations between the scar carcinoma phenotype and clinicopathological variables were evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictive factors associated with scar carcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision–recall curve analyses were additionally performed. Results: Post-TB sequelae were identified in 58.2% of patients, while active TB was present in 7.8% of cases. Adenocarcinoma represented the predominant histopathological subtype (63.3%). Fibrotic/interstitial/bronchial abnormalities (67.7%), cavitary/destructive lesions (69.0%), atelectatic/retractile changes (65.4%), and infectious/inflammatory pulmonary abnormalities (60.4%) were highly prevalent. Significant associations were identified between scar carcinoma and TB sequelae (χ2 = 811.850, p < 0.001), adenocarcinoma histology (χ2 = 655.545, p < 0.001), infectious/inflammatory changes (χ2 = 635.168, p < 0.001), cavitary/destructive lesions (χ2 = 508.347, p < 0.001), fibrotic/interstitial abnormalities (χ2 = 539.895, p < 0.001), and atelectatic/retractile changes (χ2 = 597.346, p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified haemoptysis (OR = 0.651 (95% CI: 0.486–0.871), p = 0.005) and pulmonary opacities and/or condensation (OR = 1.343 (95% CI: 1.014–1.779), p = 0.040) as independent predictive factors. ROC analysis demonstrated moderate predictive performance (AUC = 0.703). Conclusions: TB-associated pulmonary remodeling was strongly associated with the scar carcinoma phenotype, consistent with an associative role of chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and post-TB structural damage in lung carcinogenesis; however, causal inferences cannot be drawn from this retrospective observational design.
Open AccessTuberculosis-Associated Scar Carcinoma in Lung Cancer: Clinicopathological and Radiological Features of a Fibrotic-Cavitary Phenotype in a Retrospective Observational Cohort
Background: Scar carcinoma represents a distinct subtype of lung malignancy developing in areas of chronic pulmonary fibrosis, inflammation, and structural remodeling, frequently associated with previous pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). The present study aimed to evaluate the radiological, clinical, inflammatory, and histopathological characteristics associated with the scar carcinoma phenotype in patients with lung cancer (LC) and previous TB-related pulmonary abnormalities. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study conducted between February 2020 and December 2025 included 844 patients diagnosed with lung cancer. The scar carcinoma phenotype was operationally defined by the coexistence of: (1) confirmed lung cancer, (2) post-tuberculous structural pulmonary abnormalities on thoracic imaging, and (3) clinical history compatible with prior pulmonary TB. Associations between the scar carcinoma phenotype and clinicopathological variables were evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictive factors associated with scar carcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision–recall curve analyses were additionally performed. Results: Post-TB sequelae were identified in 58.2% of patients, while active TB was present in 7.8% of cases. Adenocarcinoma represented the predominant histopathological subtype (63.3%). Fibrotic/interstitial/bronchial abnormalities (67.7%), cavitary/destructive lesions (69.0%), atelectatic/retractile changes (65.4%), and infectious/inflammatory pulmonary abnormalities (60.4%) were highly prevalent. Significant associations were identified between scar carcinoma and TB sequelae (χ2 = 811.850, p < 0.001), adenocarcinoma histology (χ2 = 655.545, p < 0.001), infectious/inflammatory changes (χ2 = 635.168, p < 0.001), cavitary/destructive lesions (χ2 = 508.347, p < 0.001), fibrotic/interstitial abnormalities (χ2 = 539.895, p < 0.001), and atelectatic/retractile changes (χ2 = 597.346, p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified haemoptysis (OR = 0.651 (95% CI: 0.486–0.871), p = 0.005) and pulmonary opacities and/or condensation (OR = 1.343 (95% CI: 1.014–1.779), p = 0.040) as independent predictive factors. ROC analysis demonstrated moderate predictive performance (AUC = 0.703). Conclusions: TB-associated pulmonary remodeling was strongly associated with the scar carcinoma phenotype, consistent with an associative role of chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and post-TB structural damage in lung carcinogenesis; however, causal inferences cannot be drawn from this retrospective observational design.
- Open Access
Tuberculosis Preceding Lung Cancer: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis Revealing a Critical Gap in Post-2020 Evidence
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) has long been suspected to contribute to lung carcinogenesis through chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation. However, contemporary controlled evidence quantifying this association remains limited. We aimed to systematically evaluate the relationship between prior TB and subsequent lung malignancy, using recent observational studies and complementary case reports. Methods: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were conducted, including controlled cohort and case–control studies published from 2020 onward. Adjusted effect estimates were converted to the logarithmic scale for pooling. Heterogeneity and small-study effects were assessed using standard meta-analytic techniques. Additionally, published case reports were descriptively analyzed to explore clinicopathological patterns. Results: Across eligible studies, prior TB was consistently associated with an increased risk of subsequent lung cancer (LC). The pooled estimate demonstrated a statistically significant positive association, despite moderate heterogeneity. Larger nationwide cohorts contributed greater statistical weight, while smaller studies showed wider variability. Case reports revealed heterogeneous temporal patterns, including long-latency scar-associated carcinoma and concurrent inflammatory–malignant presentations. Conclusions: Contemporary controlled evidence supports an association between prior tuberculosis and increased risk of subsequent lung malignancy. However, despite strong biological plausibility and the abundant literature on cancer-associated tuberculosis, modern longitudinal studies specifically evaluating tuberculosis as a preceding independent risk factor remain limited. The small number of eligible post-2020 investigations identified in this meta-analysis highlights a significant contemporary research gap and underlines the need for well-designed prospective studies to clarify causality and guide surveillance strategies in TB-exposed populations.
Open AccessTuberculosis Preceding Lung Cancer: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis Revealing a Critical Gap in Post-2020 Evidence
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) has long been suspected to contribute to lung carcinogenesis through chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation. However, contemporary controlled evidence quantifying this association remains limited. We aimed to systematically evaluate the relationship between prior TB and subsequent lung malignancy, using recent observational studies and complementary case reports. Methods: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were conducted, including controlled cohort and case–control studies published from 2020 onward. Adjusted effect estimates were converted to the logarithmic scale for pooling. Heterogeneity and small-study effects were assessed using standard meta-analytic techniques. Additionally, published case reports were descriptively analyzed to explore clinicopathological patterns. Results: Across eligible studies, prior TB was consistently associated with an increased risk of subsequent lung cancer (LC). The pooled estimate demonstrated a statistically significant positive association, despite moderate heterogeneity. Larger nationwide cohorts contributed greater statistical weight, while smaller studies showed wider variability. Case reports revealed heterogeneous temporal patterns, including long-latency scar-associated carcinoma and concurrent inflammatory–malignant presentations. Conclusions: Contemporary controlled evidence supports an association between prior tuberculosis and increased risk of subsequent lung malignancy. However, despite strong biological plausibility and the abundant literature on cancer-associated tuberculosis, modern longitudinal studies specifically evaluating tuberculosis as a preceding independent risk factor remain limited. The small number of eligible post-2020 investigations identified in this meta-analysis highlights a significant contemporary research gap and underlines the need for well-designed prospective studies to clarify causality and guide surveillance strategies in TB-exposed populations.