Xiangyang Zhao
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Xiangyang Zhao has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Lulu Yang
College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
1 shared publication - Nannan Liang
College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
1 shared publication - Ru Ma
College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
1 shared publication - Rui Wang
College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
1 shared publication - Shixiang Xi
College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
1 shared publication - Xiao Zhang
Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (7) , 1065
Evaluating the Performance of AlphaEarth Foundation Embeddings for Irrigated Cropland Mapping Across Regions and Years
Accurate irrigated cropland mapping is critical for agricultural water management and food security. Existing image-based irrigation mapping workflows primarily rely on vegetation indices and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscatter features, which have limited capacity to characterize the temporal evolution of irrigation processes and crop growth conditions. The AlphaEarth Foundation (AEF) model developed by Google DeepMind provides compact embeddings with temporal semantic information learned via self-supervision, yet their utility for irrigation mapping has not been systematically assessed. In this study, a comprehensive assessment of AEF embeddings for irrigated cropland mapping was performed in terms of feature separability, classification performance, and spatiotemporal transferability. Experiments were conducted in two representative irrigated regions: the Guanzhong Plain in China and Kansas in the USA. Class separability of the 64 embedding dimensions was quantified using the Jeffries–Matusita (JM) distance. Then, the AEF embeddings were compared with the Sentinel feature set (Sentinel-2 bands, normalized difference vegetation index(NDVI), enhanced vegetation index(EVI), normalized difference water index(NDWI) and Sentinel-1 vertical transmit vertical receive(VV), vertical transmit horizontal receive(VH)) using K-means clustering and supervised classifiers, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP). Finally, transfer experiments across 2022 and 2024 in the Guanzhong Plain and Kansas were conducted to examine cross-year and cross-region performance. The results showed that AEF embeddings consistently provide stronger class separability in both study areas, with a maximum JM distance of 1.58 (A29). Using AEF embeddings, RF achieved overall accuracies (OA) of 0.95 in the Guanzhong Plain and 0.93 in Kansas, outperforming models based on Sentinel-1/2 bands and indices. Notably, unsupervised K-means clustering on AEF embeddings yielded OA > 0.85, indicating high intrinsic separability between irrigated and rainfed croplands. Transfer experiments further demonstrate stable temporal transfer (cross-year OA > 0.87), whereas cross-region transfer is constrained by differences in irrigation regimes, crop phenology and management practices, resulting in limited spatial generalization (OA~0.3). Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of high-information-density representations from geospatial foundation models for irrigated cropland mapping and provides methodological and technical insights to support transfer learning and operational mapping over large areas.
- 2 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (7) , 1065
Open AccessEvaluating the Performance of AlphaEarth Foundation Embeddings for Irrigated Cropland Mapping Across Regions and Years
Accurate irrigated cropland mapping is critical for agricultural water management and food security. Existing image-based irrigation mapping workflows primarily rely on vegetation indices and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscatter features, which have limited capacity to characterize the temporal evolution of irrigation processes and crop growth conditions. The AlphaEarth Foundation (AEF) model developed by Google DeepMind provides compact embeddings with temporal semantic information learned via self-supervision, yet their utility for irrigation mapping has not been systematically assessed. In this study, a comprehensive assessment of AEF embeddings for irrigated cropland mapping was performed in terms of feature separability, classification performance, and spatiotemporal transferability. Experiments were conducted in two representative irrigated regions: the Guanzhong Plain in China and Kansas in the USA. Class separability of the 64 embedding dimensions was quantified using the Jeffries–Matusita (JM) distance. Then, the AEF embeddings were compared with the Sentinel feature set (Sentinel-2 bands, normalized difference vegetation index(NDVI), enhanced vegetation index(EVI), normalized difference water index(NDWI) and Sentinel-1 vertical transmit vertical receive(VV), vertical transmit horizontal receive(VH)) using K-means clustering and supervised classifiers, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP). Finally, transfer experiments across 2022 and 2024 in the Guanzhong Plain and Kansas were conducted to examine cross-year and cross-region performance. The results showed that AEF embeddings consistently provide stronger class separability in both study areas, with a maximum JM distance of 1.58 (A29). Using AEF embeddings, RF achieved overall accuracies (OA) of 0.95 in the Guanzhong Plain and 0.93 in Kansas, outperforming models based on Sentinel-1/2 bands and indices. Notably, unsupervised K-means clustering on AEF embeddings yielded OA > 0.85, indicating high intrinsic separability between irrigated and rainfed croplands. Transfer experiments further demonstrate stable temporal transfer (cross-year OA > 0.87), whereas cross-region transfer is constrained by differences in irrigation regimes, crop phenology and management practices, resulting in limited spatial generalization (OA~0.3). Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of high-information-density representations from geospatial foundation models for irrigated cropland mapping and provides methodological and technical insights to support transfer learning and operational mapping over large areas.