Janice Hill

Background: Maternity care for vulnerable pregnant women presents a particular challenge within midwifery practice. In Germany, maternity services lack standardized frameworks to adequately address the specific needs of individuals who have experienced, among other factors, sexualized violence, poverty, female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), or discrimination. Limited access to healthcare among these populations contributes to increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Emerging evidence indicates that comprehensive medical and psychosocial support provided by midwives can substantially improve obstetric outcomes for marginalized pregnant women. Methods: An elective course, Antenatal Care for Vulnerable Women, was offered in the sixth semester of the Bachelor’s program in Midwifery Science at the University of Tübingen in 2025. The course provided insights into the psychosocial challenges faced by vulnerable pregnant women and prepared students for these specific aspects of midwifery practice. The curriculum incorporated foundational lectures and innovative teaching formats aimed at cultivating constructivist approaches to problem-solving. All sixth-semester midwifery students were asked to assess their knowledge and skills across five vulnerability categories: asylum-seeking, FGM/C, intimate partner violence, trauma, and racism. A pilot pre–posttest analysis using a 6-point Likert scale (1 = very good, 6 = poor) was conducted as hypothesis-generating and curriculum-guiding. The pretest included 38 respondents. The posttest included 11 respondents who attended the course. Results: Students who attended the course demonstrated observable gains in knowledge and skills across all categories, with the greatest improvements in asylum-seeking, median of 5 (IQR 4–5) vs. 2 (2–3); FGM/C, 5 (4–5) vs. 2 (2–3); and racism, 5 (3–5) vs. 2 (2–3). Conclusions: Innovative teaching methods may contribute to preparing midwifery students for targeted care of vulnerable pregnant women. Findings from the pre- and posttests provide preliminary insight into the potential value of experiential learning and may inform the further development of practice-oriented teaching methods.