Raydeep Kainth
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Raydeep Kainth has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Elizabeth Beaulieu
College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
1 shared publication - Frank D. Vrionis
Department of Neurosurgery, Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL 33486, USA
1 shared publication - Maohua Lin
Florida Atlantic University
1 shared publication - Richard Sharp
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
1 shared publication - Rudy Paul
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
1 shared publication - Talha S. Cheema
Department of Neurosurgery, Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL 33486, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (8) , 3662
Advancements, Challenges, and Innovations in Mechanical and Animal Testing of Lumbar Spine Implants
Lumbar spine disorders often require surgical intervention using medical implants to stabilize or replace damaged structures. As the prevalence of these surgeries increases due to an aging population, rigorous preclinical evaluation is critical. This narrative review aims to summarize current testing methods, identify gaps in clinical translatability, and explore the role of emerging computational technologies. Mechanical testing protocols established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provide essential standardized data on structural integrity but fail to replicate the complex biological interactions of the human spine. Similarly, animal models offer insights into biological responses like osseointegration but are limited by quadrupedal biomechanics and anatomical differences. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enable rapid, patient-specific modeling and high-throughput screening, significantly reducing the time and cost of physical testing. Future innovations include 3D-printed personalized implants, bio-responsive materials, and genetically modified animal models to bridge existing translatability gaps. In conclusion, improving the clinical success of lumbar spine implants requires an integrated framework that combines mechanical, biological, and computational approaches. This interdisciplinary collaboration is vital for developing safer and more effective treatments for patients.
- 9 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (8) , 3662
Open AccessAdvancements, Challenges, and Innovations in Mechanical and Animal Testing of Lumbar Spine Implants
Lumbar spine disorders often require surgical intervention using medical implants to stabilize or replace damaged structures. As the prevalence of these surgeries increases due to an aging population, rigorous preclinical evaluation is critical. This narrative review aims to summarize current testing methods, identify gaps in clinical translatability, and explore the role of emerging computational technologies. Mechanical testing protocols established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provide essential standardized data on structural integrity but fail to replicate the complex biological interactions of the human spine. Similarly, animal models offer insights into biological responses like osseointegration but are limited by quadrupedal biomechanics and anatomical differences. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enable rapid, patient-specific modeling and high-throughput screening, significantly reducing the time and cost of physical testing. Future innovations include 3D-printed personalized implants, bio-responsive materials, and genetically modified animal models to bridge existing translatability gaps. In conclusion, improving the clinical success of lumbar spine implants requires an integrated framework that combines mechanical, biological, and computational approaches. This interdisciplinary collaboration is vital for developing safer and more effective treatments for patients.