Eun-Kyung Jung

Background/Objectives: Injury mechanism and intent are key determinants of patient outcomes in the emergency department, yet their combined effects remain insufficiently understood. Emergency department disposition after injury may differ according to mechanism and intent and may be further influenced by specific mechanism–intent combinations. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of injury mechanism, intent, and their interaction with emergency department disposition and injury severity measured using the International Classification of Diseases-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of injury-related emergency department visits recorded between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2023. Eligible visits included those with valid arrival and departure timestamps and complete disposition data; records with missing key variables or implausible length of stay were excluded. A total of 1,029,875 visits were analyzed. The primary outcome was emergency department disposition, categorized as discharge, admission, or transfer. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate relative risk ratios, with discharge as the reference category, and to derive predicted probabilities for selected mechanism–intent combinations. Injury severity was assessed using ICISS and modeled with injury mechanism, intent, their interaction, and prespecified covariates. Results: Of all visits, 69.9% resulted in discharge, 24.3% in admission, and 5.8% in transfer. Compared with traffic accidents, the highest likelihood of admission was observed in suffocation, drowning, and poisoning injuries. Transfer was more frequent in drowning, suffocation, penetrating injuries, and poisoning. Self-harm was associated with increased risks of both admission and transfer compared with unintentional injuries. Interaction analyses showed that certain combinations, particularly poisoning with self-harm and suffocation with self-harm, were associated with substantially higher risks than either factor alone. Predicted probabilities further highlighted high-risk combinations, including markedly elevated admission probabilities in self-harm-related poisoning and suffocation, and increased transfer probability in unintentional drowning. Injury mechanism, intent, and selected interactions were also significantly associated with ICISS-based injury severity. Conclusions: Injury mechanism and intent are independently associated with emergency department disposition and injury severity, with additional risk amplification observed for specific combinations. These findings suggest that mechanism–intent combinations may serve as clinically useful risk indicators in emergency department triage and decision-making, supporting improved risk stratification and system-level coordination.