Honglin Dong

Honglin Dong

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Honglin Dong has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Chuanlong Lu

    Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China

    1 shared publication
  • Chuanlong Lu

    Vascular Institute of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University Taiyuan Shanxi People's Republic of China

    1 shared publication
  • Haifeng Li

    Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China

    1 shared publication
  • Haijiang Jin

    Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China

    1 shared publication
  • Jinshan Chen

    Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Hospital Shanxi Medical University Taiyuan China

    1 shared publication
  • Lizheng Li

    Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Hospital Shanxi Medical University Taiyuan China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Identification and validation of candidate biomarkers associated with mitochondrial metabolism in diabetic foot

    by Haifeng Li, Yijie Ning, Chuanlong Lu, Yuhang Zhang, Sheng Yan, Wenkai Chang, Haijiang Jin, Qinqin Tian, Yongbin Shi, Maolin Qiao, et al.

  • Open Access

    Genomic Structural Equation Modeling Reveals Cardiovascular‐Kidney‐Metabolic Syndrome Genetic Architecture

    by Chuanlong Lu, Lizheng Li, Jinshan Chen, Runze Chang, Honglin Dong

    Background: The genetic basis of cardiovascular‐kidney‐metabolic syndrome (CKMs) involves complex pleiotropy, necessitating analytical approaches capable of dissecting shared genetic architectures across multiple cardiometabolic traits. Methods: We employed genomic structural equation modeling (genomic SEM) to integrate summary statistics from six cardiometabolic traits. The model was assessed using standard fit indices. Genome‐wide association analyses were performed on 1,862,425 SNPs under stringent quality control measures, with LD Score regression applied to evaluate polygenic heritability and confounding bias. Novel loci were identified using GWAS‐by‐Subtraction. Functional characterization included transcriptome‐wide association analysis (TWAS), fine‐mapping, pathway enrichment analysis, and cell‐type specificity analysis. Results: The genomic SEM model demonstrated excellent fit (CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.14). Quality control metrics confirmed that genomic inflation (Lambda GC = 1.591) was primarily attributable to polygenic heritability (h 2 = 0.3286 ± 0.0135) rather than population stratification (Intercept = 1.0176 ± 0.0169). This framework identified 2,212 significantly associated variants, encompassing 32 novel loci discovered via GWAS‐by‐Subtraction. Functional annotation indicated that the majority of these loci were located in intronic (57.92%) or intergenic (30.6%) regions. TWAS and fine‐mapping nominated 188 high‐confidence genes; SENP2 (TWAS Z = 12.5), KIF11 (Z = 11.5), and JAZF1 (Z = 11.38) exhibited the strongest positive associations with CKMs risk, whereas TCF7L2 (Z = −13.4) demonstrated the strongest inverse association. Pathway enrichment implicated lipid balance and ubiquitin‐mediated proteolysis, and cell‐type specificity analysis prominently localized genetic signals to pancreatic islet cells. Fine‐mapping prioritized 18 causal variants with posterior probability ⟩ 0.95, including key signals within GCKR (rs1260333, rs780093) and INADL (rs2481665). Chromosomal regions 7 and 12 exhibited significant contributions. Conclusions: Our study unravels the shared genetic architecture of CKMs, revealing novel risk loci and pathogenic mechanisms. The results establish a direct cellular link between the pleiotropic genetic basis of CKMs and endocrine metabolic regulation within pancreatic islets.