Sanjana Chillarege
Research Subjects
Sanjana Chillarege has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kruthik Ravikanti
Center of Excellence in Computational Cognition, Georgia Tech
2 shared publications - Kushal Dudipala
School of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332
2 shared publications - Mayukh Deb
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
2 shared publications - N. Apurva Ratan Murty
School of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332
2 shared publications - Ranjani Koushik
Center of Excellence in Computational Cognition, Georgia Tech
2 shared publications - Ruolin Wang
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Zero-shot evaluations expose structured generalization limits in predictive models of the brain
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can predict neural responses to natural images with remarkable accuracy, making them promising models of human vision. However, prediction scores alone reveal little about what computations these models have captured or how well they generalize beyond the images on which they are trained. Here, we introduce a principled zero-shot model evaluation framework in which ANN-based encoding models are frozen before being tested on not just held out images but entirely new datasets. Our strongest tests repurpose decades of cognitive neuroscience experiments as diagnostic benchmarks for identifying which computations current models capture and where they fail. To implement this framework we built encoding models of human category-selective regions (FFA, PPA, and EBA) using several pretrained ANNs and evaluated these fixed models across 7 independent fMRI datasets and 31 cognitive experiments from 10 published studies. This framework revealed three broad patterns. First, zero-shot evaluations exposed systematic limits to model predictivity that were largely hidden by standard within-dataset cross-validation. These limits were structured varying across brain regions and model classes and depending strongly on the similarity between the images used to build and test the models. Second, current models reproduced some, but not all, classical findings from cognitive neuroscience, providing a diagnosis of the computations that current models have yet to capture. Finally, models that performed well on prediction tests also tended to succeed at reproducing cognitive neuroscience findings, suggesting that prediction and explanation are closely linked. Unlike prediction scores however, cognitive tests help diagnose where and why models fail. Together, the zero-shot evaluation framework provides a scalable and unified approach for evaluating brain models across prediction and cognitive neuroscience tests, which can help us better understand what current models capture and what still remains to be explained.
Open AccessZero-shot evaluations expose structured generalization limits in predictive models of the brain
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can predict neural responses to natural images with remarkable accuracy, making them promising models of human vision. However, prediction scores alone reveal little about what computations these models have captured or how well they generalize beyond the images on which they are trained. Here, we introduce a principled zero-shot model evaluation framework in which ANN-based encoding models are frozen before being tested on not just held out images but entirely new datasets. Our strongest tests repurpose decades of cognitive neuroscience experiments as diagnostic benchmarks for identifying which computations current models capture and where they fail. To implement this framework we built encoding models of human category-selective regions (FFA, PPA, and EBA) using several pretrained ANNs and evaluated these fixed models across 7 independent fMRI datasets and 31 cognitive experiments from 10 published studies. This framework revealed three broad patterns. First, zero-shot evaluations exposed systematic limits to model predictivity that were largely hidden by standard within-dataset cross-validation. These limits were structured varying across brain regions and model classes and depending strongly on the similarity between the images used to build and test the models. Second, current models reproduced some, but not all, classical findings from cognitive neuroscience, providing a diagnosis of the computations that current models have yet to capture. Finally, models that performed well on prediction tests also tended to succeed at reproducing cognitive neuroscience findings, suggesting that prediction and explanation are closely linked. Unlike prediction scores however, cognitive tests help diagnose where and why models fail. Together, the zero-shot evaluation framework provides a scalable and unified approach for evaluating brain models across prediction and cognitive neuroscience tests, which can help us better understand what current models capture and what still remains to be explained.
- Open Access
- 13 April 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1-7
Cortex-Canvas: An Interactive Web Interface for Executing and Evaluating Models of Category-Selective Regions in Human Visual Cortex
- 13 April 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1-7
Open AccessCortex-Canvas: An Interactive Web Interface for Executing and Evaluating Models of Category-Selective Regions in Human Visual Cortex