Paola Di Giacomo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Paola Di Giacomo has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alberto Fratocchi
Oral Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Antonella Polimeni
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Carlo Di Paolo
Gnathologic Division, Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Cira Rosaria Tiziana Di Gioia
Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Daniela Messineo
Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Fabrizio Spallaccia
Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, “S. Maria” Hospital, Terni, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (8) , 1222
Radiomics in the Evaluation of Cystic and Neoplastic Lytic Lesions of the Jaws
Background/Objectives. Radiomics is an emerging imaging-based tool that enhances lesion characterization beyond conventional diagnostic approaches. Its potential in evaluating osteolytic lesions of the jaws lies in improving discrimination between benign and malignant entities. This study aimed at developing a predictive model to identify radiomic features capable of distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. Methods. Subjects with preoperative CT or CBCT and histopathological confirmation were included. A pilot cohort was used for feature selection via LASSO regression, which ranked features by frequency and absolute coefficient. Malignancy was coded as class 1, benign lesions as class 0. Positive coefficients indicated association with malignancy, while negative coefficients with benign characteristics. The most stable features were initially trained on the pilot cohort and then validated on an independent test set through machine learning classifiers as LASSO, support vector machine, artificial neural network, random forest e XGboost. Results. The sample comprised 69 subjects (pilot cohort = 57, test cohort = 12). The predictors selected from LASSO regression were: DifferenceEntropy_GLCM (−0.768), CenterOfMassShift_MORPHOLOGICAL (−1.390), INTENSITY-HISTOGRAM_MaximumHistogramGradientGrayLevel (1.139), GLRLM_ShortRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis (−0.742), and Maximum3DDiameter_MORPHOLOGICAL (0.932). As for model performance on test, LASSO achieved the best performance (AUC 0.83), with perfect specificity and sensitivity of 0.71. SVM showed good AUC but poor sensitivity, while random forest and XGBoost performed poorly (AUC 0.57 and 0.37, respectively). Conclusions. The LASSO model proved to be a transparent and robust classifier, suitable for both feature selection and external validation. The selected features demonstrated strong discriminative ability, supporting the potential of radiomics in improving lesion assessment and guiding clinical decision-making.
- 20 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (8) , 1222
Open AccessRadiomics in the Evaluation of Cystic and Neoplastic Lytic Lesions of the Jaws
Background/Objectives. Radiomics is an emerging imaging-based tool that enhances lesion characterization beyond conventional diagnostic approaches. Its potential in evaluating osteolytic lesions of the jaws lies in improving discrimination between benign and malignant entities. This study aimed at developing a predictive model to identify radiomic features capable of distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. Methods. Subjects with preoperative CT or CBCT and histopathological confirmation were included. A pilot cohort was used for feature selection via LASSO regression, which ranked features by frequency and absolute coefficient. Malignancy was coded as class 1, benign lesions as class 0. Positive coefficients indicated association with malignancy, while negative coefficients with benign characteristics. The most stable features were initially trained on the pilot cohort and then validated on an independent test set through machine learning classifiers as LASSO, support vector machine, artificial neural network, random forest e XGboost. Results. The sample comprised 69 subjects (pilot cohort = 57, test cohort = 12). The predictors selected from LASSO regression were: DifferenceEntropy_GLCM (−0.768), CenterOfMassShift_MORPHOLOGICAL (−1.390), INTENSITY-HISTOGRAM_MaximumHistogramGradientGrayLevel (1.139), GLRLM_ShortRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis (−0.742), and Maximum3DDiameter_MORPHOLOGICAL (0.932). As for model performance on test, LASSO achieved the best performance (AUC 0.83), with perfect specificity and sensitivity of 0.71. SVM showed good AUC but poor sensitivity, while random forest and XGBoost performed poorly (AUC 0.57 and 0.37, respectively). Conclusions. The LASSO model proved to be a transparent and robust classifier, suitable for both feature selection and external validation. The selected features demonstrated strong discriminative ability, supporting the potential of radiomics in improving lesion assessment and guiding clinical decision-making.