Jing Ding
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Jing Ding has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chunling Zhang
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
1 shared publication - Huidan Li
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
1 shared publication - Huiying Qiu
Department of Hematology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
1 shared publication - Jiatao Lou
Shanghai General Hospital 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication - Ting Xu
Department of Clinical Practice, Hangzhou Zhiwei Information and Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311200, China
1 shared publication - Weilin Liu
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (8) , 1244
A Deep Learning Model for IMMP-Based Residual Disease Monitoring in AML with Monocytic Differentiation
Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with monocytic differentiation poses significant clinical challenges, including high relapse rates and chemotherapy resistance. Current morphological assessment is limited by inter-observer variability, low sensitivity, and inefficiency, especially for detecting low-level residual disease. This creates an urgent need for automated, objective tools to improve diagnostic consistency and monitoring. Artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning, offers potential for extracting high-dimensional cytomorphological features to address these gaps. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 184 bone marrow smear slides from patients with monocytic leukemia was used. The core biomarker was the immature monocyte percentage (IMMP), defined as monoblasts plus promonocytes among nucleated cells, with a 2.0% clinical cutoff. An EfficientNet-based convolutional neural network was developed via transfer learning and trained to classify four cell types: monoblasts, promonocytes, monocytes, and other cells. Results: The model achieved robust cell-level classification, with F1 scores of 0.82 for monoblasts and 0.34 for promonocytes. At the slide level, using an optimized IMMP threshold of 0.045, it accurately assessed persistent leukemic cell burden with 78.9% Accuracy, 81.1% Recall, and 76.9% Specificity. Model-predicted IMMP values showed strong correlation with expert-derived values (Pearson r = 0.827), demonstrating reliable quantitative agreement. Conclusions: This deep learning model provides an automated, objective tool for quantifying immature monocytes, addressing key limitations in morphological assessment of monocytic AML. The IMMP metric shows promise for monitoring treatment response, predicting relapse, and potentially identifying patients at risk of venetoclax-based therapy resistance. While promising, prospective multicenter validation is needed to translate these findings into routine clinical practice.
- 21 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (8) , 1244
Open AccessA Deep Learning Model for IMMP-Based Residual Disease Monitoring in AML with Monocytic Differentiation
Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with monocytic differentiation poses significant clinical challenges, including high relapse rates and chemotherapy resistance. Current morphological assessment is limited by inter-observer variability, low sensitivity, and inefficiency, especially for detecting low-level residual disease. This creates an urgent need for automated, objective tools to improve diagnostic consistency and monitoring. Artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning, offers potential for extracting high-dimensional cytomorphological features to address these gaps. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 184 bone marrow smear slides from patients with monocytic leukemia was used. The core biomarker was the immature monocyte percentage (IMMP), defined as monoblasts plus promonocytes among nucleated cells, with a 2.0% clinical cutoff. An EfficientNet-based convolutional neural network was developed via transfer learning and trained to classify four cell types: monoblasts, promonocytes, monocytes, and other cells. Results: The model achieved robust cell-level classification, with F1 scores of 0.82 for monoblasts and 0.34 for promonocytes. At the slide level, using an optimized IMMP threshold of 0.045, it accurately assessed persistent leukemic cell burden with 78.9% Accuracy, 81.1% Recall, and 76.9% Specificity. Model-predicted IMMP values showed strong correlation with expert-derived values (Pearson r = 0.827), demonstrating reliable quantitative agreement. Conclusions: This deep learning model provides an automated, objective tool for quantifying immature monocytes, addressing key limitations in morphological assessment of monocytic AML. The IMMP metric shows promise for monitoring treatment response, predicting relapse, and potentially identifying patients at risk of venetoclax-based therapy resistance. While promising, prospective multicenter validation is needed to translate these findings into routine clinical practice.