Benjamin Midler
Research Subjects
Benjamin Midler has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Alejandro Pan Vazquez
Princeton Neuroscience Institute
3 shared publicationsDmitriy Aronov
Columbia University, New York, USA
1 shared publication- Ilana B. Witten
Princeton University, Princeton, USA
1 shared publication Karan Sikka
Columbia University, New York, USA
1 shared publicationKeemin Lee
Columbia University, New York, USA
1 shared publication- Lenny Aharon
Columbia University, New York, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 August 2026
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife preprints
- Vol. 15
Evolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics
The learning dynamics of biological brains and artificial neural networks are of interest to both neuroscience and machine learning. A key difference between them is that neural networks are often trained from a randomly initialized state whereas each brain is the product of generations of evolutionary optimization, yielding innate structures that enable few-shot learning and inbuilt reflexes. Artificial neural networks, by contrast, require non-ethological quantities of training data to attain comparable performance. To investigate the effect of evolutionary optimization on the learning dynamics of neural networks, we combined algorithms simulating natural selection and online learning to produce a method for evolutionarily conditioning artificial neural networks, and applied it to both reinforcement and supervised learning contexts. We found the evolutionary conditioning algorithm, by itself, performs comparably to an unoptimized baseline. However, evolutionarily conditioned networks show signs of unique and latent learning dynamics, and can be rapidly fine-tuned to optimal performance. These results suggest evolution constitutes an inductive bias that tunes neural systems to enable rapid learning.
- 27 August 2026
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife preprints
- Vol. 15
Open AccessEvolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics
The learning dynamics of biological brains and artificial neural networks are of interest to both neuroscience and machine learning. A key difference between them is that neural networks are often trained from a randomly initialized state whereas each brain is the product of generations of evolutionary optimization, yielding innate structures that enable few-shot learning and inbuilt reflexes. Artificial neural networks, by contrast, require non-ethological quantities of training data to attain comparable performance. To investigate the effect of evolutionary optimization on the learning dynamics of neural networks, we combined algorithms simulating natural selection and online learning to produce a method for evolutionarily conditioning artificial neural networks, and applied it to both reinforcement and supervised learning contexts. We found the evolutionary conditioning algorithm, by itself, performs comparably to an unoptimized baseline. However, evolutionarily conditioned networks show signs of unique and latent learning dynamics, and can be rapidly fine-tuned to optimal performance. These results suggest evolution constitutes an inductive bias that tunes neural systems to enable rapid learning.
- Open Access
Evolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics
The learning dynamics of biological brains and artificial neural networks are of interest to both neuroscience and machine learning. A key difference between them is that neural networks are often trained from a randomly initialized state whereas each brain is the product of generations of evolutionary optimization, yielding innate structures that enable few-shot learning and inbuilt reflexes. Artificial neural networks, by contrast, require non-ethological quantities of training data to attain comparable performance. To investigate the effect of evolutionary optimization on the learning dynamics of neural networks, we combined algorithms simulating natural selection and online learning to produce a method for evolutionarily conditioning artificial neural networks, and applied it to both reinforcement and supervised learning contexts. We found the evolutionary conditioning algorithm, by itself, performs comparably to an unoptimized baseline. However, evolutionarily conditioned networks show signs of unique and latent learning dynamics, and can be rapidly fine-tuned to optimal performance. These results suggest evolution constitutes an inductive bias that tunes neural systems to enable rapid learning.
Open AccessEvolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics
The learning dynamics of biological brains and artificial neural networks are of interest to both neuroscience and machine learning. A key difference between them is that neural networks are often trained from a randomly initialized state whereas each brain is the product of generations of evolutionary optimization, yielding innate structures that enable few-shot learning and inbuilt reflexes. Artificial neural networks, by contrast, require non-ethological quantities of training data to attain comparable performance. To investigate the effect of evolutionary optimization on the learning dynamics of neural networks, we combined algorithms simulating natural selection and online learning to produce a method for evolutionarily conditioning artificial neural networks, and applied it to both reinforcement and supervised learning contexts. We found the evolutionary conditioning algorithm, by itself, performs comparably to an unoptimized baseline. However, evolutionarily conditioned networks show signs of unique and latent learning dynamics, and can be rapidly fine-tuned to optimal performance. These results suggest evolution constitutes an inductive bias that tunes neural systems to enable rapid learning.
- Open Access
Lightning Pose 3D: an uncertainty-aware framework for data-efficient multi-view animal pose estimation
Multi-view pose estimation is essential for quantifying animal behavior in scientific research, yet current methods struggle to achieve accurate tracking with limited labeled data and suffer from poor uncertainty estimates. We address these challenges with a flexible framework that can operate with or without camera calibration, combining novel training and post-processing techniques with an uncertainty-aware pseudo-labeling distillation procedure. Our multi-view model processes all camera views jointly using a pretrained vision transformer backbone, and a simulated occlusion technique encourages the model to learn robust cross-view correspondences without requiring camera parameters. When camera parameters are available, 3D data augmentations and a triangulation-based loss further encourage geometric consistency. We extend the Ensemble Kalman Smoother (EKS) post-processor to the nonlinear case, leveraging camera geometry, and introduce a variance inflation technique that detects cross-view inconsistencies and corrects overconfident predictions. We validate our approach on five datasets spanning three species (fly, mouse, bird), including a multi-animal dataset with two visually distinct individuals; the proposed pipeline consistently outperforms existing methods across datasets. We demonstrate how these improvements translate to downstream scientific analyses using data from the International Brain Laboratory, showing improved unsupervised behavioral clustering and neural decoding of paw kinematics with just 200 labeled frames. To facilitate adoption, we developed a browser-based, cloud-compatible user interface that supports the full life cycle of multi-view pose estimation, from labeling and model training to post-processing with EKS and diagnostic visualizations.
Open AccessLightning Pose 3D: an uncertainty-aware framework for data-efficient multi-view animal pose estimation
Multi-view pose estimation is essential for quantifying animal behavior in scientific research, yet current methods struggle to achieve accurate tracking with limited labeled data and suffer from poor uncertainty estimates. We address these challenges with a flexible framework that can operate with or without camera calibration, combining novel training and post-processing techniques with an uncertainty-aware pseudo-labeling distillation procedure. Our multi-view model processes all camera views jointly using a pretrained vision transformer backbone, and a simulated occlusion technique encourages the model to learn robust cross-view correspondences without requiring camera parameters. When camera parameters are available, 3D data augmentations and a triangulation-based loss further encourage geometric consistency. We extend the Ensemble Kalman Smoother (EKS) post-processor to the nonlinear case, leveraging camera geometry, and introduce a variance inflation technique that detects cross-view inconsistencies and corrects overconfident predictions. We validate our approach on five datasets spanning three species (fly, mouse, bird), including a multi-animal dataset with two visually distinct individuals; the proposed pipeline consistently outperforms existing methods across datasets. We demonstrate how these improvements translate to downstream scientific analyses using data from the International Brain Laboratory, showing improved unsupervised behavioral clustering and neural decoding of paw kinematics with just 200 labeled frames. To facilitate adoption, we developed a browser-based, cloud-compatible user interface that supports the full life cycle of multi-view pose estimation, from labeling and model training to post-processing with EKS and diagnostic visualizations.
- Open Access
Evolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics
The learning dynamics of biological brains and artificial neural networks are of interest to both neuroscience and machine learning. A key difference between them is that neural networks are often trained from a randomly initialized state whereas each brain is the product of generations of evolutionary optimization, yielding innate structures that enable few-shot learning and inbuilt reflexes. Artificial neural networks, by contrast, require non-ethological quantities of training data to attain comparable performance. To investigate the effect of evolutionary optimization on the learning dynamics of neural networks, we combined algorithms simulating natural selection and online learning to produce a method for evolutionarily conditioning artificial neural networks, and applied it to both reinforcement and supervised learning contexts. We found the evolutionary conditioning algorithm, by itself, performs comparably to an unoptimized baseline. However, evolutionarily conditioned networks show signs of unique and latent learning dynamics, and can be rapidly fine-tuned to optimal performance. These results suggest evolution constitutes an inductive bias that tunes neural systems to enable rapid learning.
Open AccessEvolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics
The learning dynamics of biological brains and artificial neural networks are of interest to both neuroscience and machine learning. A key difference between them is that neural networks are often trained from a randomly initialized state whereas each brain is the product of generations of evolutionary optimization, yielding innate structures that enable few-shot learning and inbuilt reflexes. Artificial neural networks, by contrast, require non-ethological quantities of training data to attain comparable performance. To investigate the effect of evolutionary optimization on the learning dynamics of neural networks, we combined algorithms simulating natural selection and online learning to produce a method for evolutionarily conditioning artificial neural networks, and applied it to both reinforcement and supervised learning contexts. We found the evolutionary conditioning algorithm, by itself, performs comparably to an unoptimized baseline. However, evolutionarily conditioned networks show signs of unique and latent learning dynamics, and can be rapidly fine-tuned to optimal performance. These results suggest evolution constitutes an inductive bias that tunes neural systems to enable rapid learning.