APAnna Pirsch

Anna Pirsch

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Anna Pirsch has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    “I Will Never Be Enough Because My Skin Color Isn’t Right”: Structural Racism and Healthcare Access Following Nonfatal Strangulation Among Black Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence

    by Jeneile Luebke, Kaylen M. Moore, Lucy Mkandawire-Valhmu, Leso Munala, Hanan Abusbaitan, Frances Kimber, Jacqueline Callari Robinson, Breanna Heisterkamp, Antonia Norton, Anna Pirsch, et al.

    Background: Nonfatal strangulation (NFS) is one of the most lethal forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) that is associated with increased risk of future homicide, yet it frequently goes unrecognized within healthcare settings. Black women experience disproportionately high rates of IPV while simultaneously facing structural barriers to healthcare access. Little research has examined how Black women survivors experience strangulation and navigate decisions about seeking care following NFS and other potentially lethal forms of IPV. Methods: This secondary qualitative analysis draws on interview data from 28 Black women survivors of IPV who participated in a larger community-engaged mixed-methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in an Upper Midwestern state. Of these, 17 (60.7%) both reported experiencing strangulation on the parent-study survey and described experiences consistent with nonfatal strangulation during their qualitative interviews and comprised the analytic sample for the present analysis. Guided by Black Feminist Thought, semi-structured interviews examined survivors’ experiences with violence, safety, help-seeking, and interactions with healthcare and social service systems. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Schensul and Schensul. Results: Three interconnected themes were identified. First, survivors described racism and anticipated discrimination as significant barriers to seeking healthcare following strangulation. Second, shame, stigma, and fear of judgment contributed to self-silencing and avoidance of formal services. Third, survivors described strangulation as a terrifying and potentially lethal form of violence occurring within broader histories of polyvictimization and cumulative trauma. Despite experiencing serious symptoms, many participants avoided healthcare because they feared retaliation from abusive partners, anticipated dismissive treatment, or believed healthcare systems would be unable to protect them. Together, these experiences illustrate how structural racism, institutional mistrust, and gendered violence intersect to shape healthcare decision-making. Conclusions: Findings suggest that barriers to care following strangulation extend beyond individual help-seeking behaviors and are deeply rooted in structural inequities. Improving outcomes for Black women survivors requires enhanced provider training on strangulation assessment, trauma- and violence-informed approaches, culturally responsive care, and healthcare system reforms that address racism, mistrust, and survivor safety. These findings have important implications for reducing disparities in IPV-related health outcomes and improving responses to high-lethality violence.

  • Open Access

    Lethality Risk in Abusive Intimate Relationships Among Urban Black Women in Wisconsin During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    by Hanan A. Abusbaitan, Anna Pirsch, Maria Graf, Lucy Mkandawire-Valhmu, Anwar Eyadat, Jeneile Luebke, Diane M. Schadewald, Duo Yu, Peninnah M. Kako, Leso Munala, et al.

    Background: Intimate partner homicide is one of the leading causes of death for women, disproportionately affecting Black women. Purpose: To investigate the severity of lethality risk and its relationship with individual characteristics, experiences of discrimination, and mental health among urban Black women in Wisconsin since the start of COVID-19. Methods: This analysis was part of a larger mixed-methods study. Women were recruited from community agencies in Wisconsin. Eligible participants could participate either in person, by phone call, or via Teams. Lethality was assessed using the Lethality Assessment Protocol (LAP). The experiences of discrimination were measured by the Experiences of Everyday Discrimination (EDS). Mental health and all other demographic variables were self-reported. The data collection was conducted between 2023 and 2025. Analyses were conducted using descriptive analysis, simple linear regression, and multiple regression. All analyses were conducted in SPSS version 29. Results: Data from 185 urban Black women were analyzed, with an overall mean weighted LAP score of 17.29. The overall regression was significant, accounting for approximately 5% of the variance in LAP scores. Experiencing discrimination at least once per year was significantly associated with LAP score ( p < 0.05) when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion: These findings highlighted that the experiences of discrimination are a significant predictor of lethality risk among Black women experiencing IPV, underscoring the contribution of structural and social factors to health inequities. The study underscored the need to appraise victims’ experiences of discrimination within IPV risk-assessment policies and to integrate these policies into routine care, and it calls for further research on pathways to IPV homicide in marginalized communities. Further research is needed to better understand the pathways of IPV homicide, particularly among highly marginalized communities.