Jaime Wehr
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Jaime Wehr has a total of 95 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Patrick M. Forde
Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
35 shared publications - Valsamo Anagnostou
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
35 shared publications - Archana Balan
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center 1 , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
34 shared publications - Christine L. Hann
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
34 shared publications - Joseph C. Murray
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center 1 , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
34 shared publications - Vincent K. Lam
Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland; Bloomberg∼Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
34 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- p. OF1-OF19
Landmark ctDNA Molecular Response Represents an Early Predictor of Immunotherapy Outcomes in Lung Cancer: A Clinical Validity Study
Purpose: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses are informative as an early indicator of immunotherapy response in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the clinical value of ctDNA molecular response (mR) requires further validation. Experimental Design: As part of a prospective clinical protocol (NCT05995821), we conducted targeted error-correction sequencing of ctDNA (n = 328) and matched white blood cell (WBC) DNA (n = 109) from 109 patients with metastatic NSCLC who received anti–PD-(L)1 either as monotherapy or in combination. Following cellular origin resolution of 2,818 variants, landmark mR was defined as undetectable ctDNA within 3 to 9 weeks of treatment initiation. Results: Pre-treatment ctDNA burden, but not blood tumor mutation burden, predicted survival. Implementing a tumor-naïve WBC DNA-informed approach increased the number of evaluable cases without compromising the overall accuracy of landmark ctDNA mR. A direct comparison of single-timepoint on-therapy ctDNA assessment with ctDNA dynamics from baseline to the 3- to 9-week interval, along with an analysis of heterogeneity in mR within the 3- to 9-week window, showed that undetectable ctDNA at the landmark timepoint can effectively predict survival outcomes. A significant enrichment in landmark ctDNA mR was noted among patients with progression-free survival (PFS) ≥6 months on immunotherapy (P = 2.5e−05) or chemoimmunotherapy (P = 0.02). Patients in the landmark mR group had longer PFS (P = 1.6e−06) and overall survival (P = 2.5e−05) than those with molecular progression. Conclusions: Landmark ctDNA mR provides a real-time, accurate approach for monitoring immunotherapy clinical outcomes. Although not currently validated for regulatory use, these findings demonstrate the potential validity of ctDNA as an early endpoint of immunotherapy response.
- 24 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- p. OF1-OF19
Open AccessLandmark ctDNA Molecular Response Represents an Early Predictor of Immunotherapy Outcomes in Lung Cancer: A Clinical Validity Study
Purpose: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses are informative as an early indicator of immunotherapy response in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the clinical value of ctDNA molecular response (mR) requires further validation. Experimental Design: As part of a prospective clinical protocol (NCT05995821), we conducted targeted error-correction sequencing of ctDNA (n = 328) and matched white blood cell (WBC) DNA (n = 109) from 109 patients with metastatic NSCLC who received anti–PD-(L)1 either as monotherapy or in combination. Following cellular origin resolution of 2,818 variants, landmark mR was defined as undetectable ctDNA within 3 to 9 weeks of treatment initiation. Results: Pre-treatment ctDNA burden, but not blood tumor mutation burden, predicted survival. Implementing a tumor-naïve WBC DNA-informed approach increased the number of evaluable cases without compromising the overall accuracy of landmark ctDNA mR. A direct comparison of single-timepoint on-therapy ctDNA assessment with ctDNA dynamics from baseline to the 3- to 9-week interval, along with an analysis of heterogeneity in mR within the 3- to 9-week window, showed that undetectable ctDNA at the landmark timepoint can effectively predict survival outcomes. A significant enrichment in landmark ctDNA mR was noted among patients with progression-free survival (PFS) ≥6 months on immunotherapy (P = 2.5e−05) or chemoimmunotherapy (P = 0.02). Patients in the landmark mR group had longer PFS (P = 1.6e−06) and overall survival (P = 2.5e−05) than those with molecular progression. Conclusions: Landmark ctDNA mR provides a real-time, accurate approach for monitoring immunotherapy clinical outcomes. Although not currently validated for regulatory use, these findings demonstrate the potential validity of ctDNA as an early endpoint of immunotherapy response.
- Open Access
- 1 July 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in JCO Precision Oncology
- Vol. 10 (7) , e2600067
Emergence of Microsatellite Instability in an Oncogene-Driven Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a Canonical EGFR Mutation: A Molecular Tumor Board Discussion
- 1 July 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in JCO Precision Oncology
- Vol. 10 (7) , e2600067
Open AccessEmergence of Microsatellite Instability in an Oncogene-Driven Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a Canonical EGFR Mutation: A Molecular Tumor Board Discussion
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S9 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S9. Putative uncommon on-target drivers of EGFR TKI resistance.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S9 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S9. Putative uncommon on-target drivers of EGFR TKI resistance.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S4 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S4. Description of pCGP-informed clinical management.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S4 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S4. Description of pCGP-informed clinical management.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Figure S2. Actionable alterations identified on all instances of first pCGP.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Figure S2. Actionable alterations identified on all instances of first pCGP.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Tables S1-S6 from plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis–Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors
Supplementary Table S1: Training cohort description with plasmaCHORD feature values. Supplementary Table S2: Description of the serial cohort. Supplementary Table S3: Validation cohort description with plasamCHORD feature values. Supplementary Table S4: Description of plasmaCHORD features. Supplementary Table S5: Correlation of cfDNA fragmentomic feature statistics between baseline and follow-up time points in the serial cohort. Supplementary Table S6: Possible CH-origin variants identified on retrospective analysis of 45 patients reviewed at the JH-MTB.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Tables S1-S6 from plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis–Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors
Supplementary Table S1: Training cohort description with plasmaCHORD feature values. Supplementary Table S2: Description of the serial cohort. Supplementary Table S3: Validation cohort description with plasamCHORD feature values. Supplementary Table S4: Description of plasmaCHORD features. Supplementary Table S5: Correlation of cfDNA fragmentomic feature statistics between baseline and follow-up time points in the serial cohort. Supplementary Table S6: Possible CH-origin variants identified on retrospective analysis of 45 patients reviewed at the JH-MTB.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S1. Context of first pCGP assays.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S1. Context of first pCGP assays.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis–Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors
Purpose:Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) enables comprehensive molecular profiling and can guide the selection of genotype-targeted therapies. However, the detection of variants derived from clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a significant confounder in liquid biopsies.Experimental Design:Using a training cohort of 426 variants identified in cfDNA NGS from 225 patients with stage I to IV solid tumors, we developed plasma Clonal Hematopoiesis ORigin Detection (plasmaCHORD), a machine learning model that includes fragment-, variant-, and patient-level features to distinguish between tumor and CH origin for each variant detected by liquid biopsies. Model performance was assessed by comparison with the reference origin for each plasma variant determined from matched white blood cell and tumor NGS. Following the locking of the model parameters, we applied plasmaCHORD to an independent validation cohort of 1,418 plasma variants detected in 114 patients with metastatic cancers, as well as to cfDNA NGS from patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (NCT05585684).Results:plasmaCHORD predicted tumor origin versus CH origin in the training set with high accuracy (AUC = 0.94). In the independent validation cohort, the locked model maintained similar overall accuracy (AUC = 0.9) and demonstrated significant improvement in accuracy for clinically significant genes. When applied to clinically challenging cases in the context of a precision oncology clinical trial, plasmaCHORD precisely determined variant origin, preventing mismatches with genotype-targeted therapies.Conclusions:plasmaCHORD, a multifeature machine learning model, can significantly enhance the ability to identify bona fide tumor variants in routine plasma-only NGS, addressing a critical need for implementing liquid biopsy–guided therapy by minimizing misinterpretation caused by CH.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis–Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors
Purpose:Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) enables comprehensive molecular profiling and can guide the selection of genotype-targeted therapies. However, the detection of variants derived from clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a significant confounder in liquid biopsies.Experimental Design:Using a training cohort of 426 variants identified in cfDNA NGS from 225 patients with stage I to IV solid tumors, we developed plasma Clonal Hematopoiesis ORigin Detection (plasmaCHORD), a machine learning model that includes fragment-, variant-, and patient-level features to distinguish between tumor and CH origin for each variant detected by liquid biopsies. Model performance was assessed by comparison with the reference origin for each plasma variant determined from matched white blood cell and tumor NGS. Following the locking of the model parameters, we applied plasmaCHORD to an independent validation cohort of 1,418 plasma variants detected in 114 patients with metastatic cancers, as well as to cfDNA NGS from patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (NCT05585684).Results:plasmaCHORD predicted tumor origin versus CH origin in the training set with high accuracy (AUC = 0.94). In the independent validation cohort, the locked model maintained similar overall accuracy (AUC = 0.9) and demonstrated significant improvement in accuracy for clinically significant genes. When applied to clinically challenging cases in the context of a precision oncology clinical trial, plasmaCHORD precisely determined variant origin, preventing mismatches with genotype-targeted therapies.Conclusions:plasmaCHORD, a multifeature machine learning model, can significantly enhance the ability to identify bona fide tumor variants in routine plasma-only NGS, addressing a critical need for implementing liquid biopsy–guided therapy by minimizing misinterpretation caused by CH.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis–Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors
Classification schema for determining reference origin of plasma variants using matched WBC and/or tumor tissue sequencing. For each variant detected in plasma, reference origin was determined by comparison with matched WBC sequencing and tumor sequencing (if available). If patient had both WBC and tumor sequencing, then plasma variants that were detected with at least 3 read families in WBC and not detected in tumor were considered WBC-derived. Variants were considered tumor-derived if they were detected with VAF >10% in tumor, or if the variant was detected by IGV in the tumor and was detected in 1 or fewer read families in WBC sequencing. If patient had only WBC sequencing, then plasma variants that were also identified in WBC sequencing with at least 3 read families were called CH-derived. Plasma variants that were not identified in matched WBC sequencing (0 read families) where there was adequate coverage in the WBC sequencing at that locus were called tumor-derived. Variants that did not meet any of these criteria were determined to be unknown origin and were excluded from the remaining analysis.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis–Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors
Classification schema for determining reference origin of plasma variants using matched WBC and/or tumor tissue sequencing. For each variant detected in plasma, reference origin was determined by comparison with matched WBC sequencing and tumor sequencing (if available). If patient had both WBC and tumor sequencing, then plasma variants that were detected with at least 3 read families in WBC and not detected in tumor were considered WBC-derived. Variants were considered tumor-derived if they were detected with VAF >10% in tumor, or if the variant was detected by IGV in the tumor and was detected in 1 or fewer read families in WBC sequencing. If patient had only WBC sequencing, then plasma variants that were also identified in WBC sequencing with at least 3 read families were called CH-derived. Plasma variants that were not identified in matched WBC sequencing (0 read families) where there was adequate coverage in the WBC sequencing at that locus were called tumor-derived. Variants that did not meet any of these criteria were determined to be unknown origin and were excluded from the remaining analysis.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S10 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S10. Drivers of EGFR TKI resistance.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S10 from Serial Plasma Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Captures Therapy Resistance and Guides Management of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Supplementary Table S10. Drivers of EGFR TKI resistance.