Yuqi Xia
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Yuqi Xia has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Haiqiang Wang
School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication - Wei Peng
School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication - Xinyu Liu
School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication - Yang Tang
School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication - Yexin Chen
School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication - Yue Han
School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (9) , 4456
Research on Earthquake Demolition Rescue Robot Design Based on UXM–Kano–QFD Framework
This study presents an integrated design methodology for earthquake demolition rescue robots by combining UXMs, Kano, and QFD to improve design rationality and performance in extreme rescue scenarios. It addresses key gaps in existing approaches, particularly the lack of systematic experiential data acquisition, quantitative requirement analysis, and effective design translation. UXMs are applied to reconstruct critical task scenarios and identify high-load nodes and user experience variations. The Kano model is used to prioritise and classify user requirements, which are then translated into engineering characteristics through QFD. Based on this framework, a conceptual robot design is developed using the FBS model and evaluated through process-level simulation and usability assessment. The results demonstrate that the proposed method enables structured requirement transformation and supports traceable design decisions. Simulation indicates the consistency of task workflows and coordination among functional modules at the process level. A System Usability Scale score of 80.22 indicates a relatively high level of perceived usability at the conceptual evaluation stage. The proposed methodology provides a structured and traceable conceptual design framework for earthquake rescue robots. While the current validation is based on conceptual-level evaluation, the methodology offers a traceable design pathway that may be extended to other high-risk emergency equipment with further empirical testing.
- 1 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (9) , 4456
Open AccessResearch on Earthquake Demolition Rescue Robot Design Based on UXM–Kano–QFD Framework
This study presents an integrated design methodology for earthquake demolition rescue robots by combining UXMs, Kano, and QFD to improve design rationality and performance in extreme rescue scenarios. It addresses key gaps in existing approaches, particularly the lack of systematic experiential data acquisition, quantitative requirement analysis, and effective design translation. UXMs are applied to reconstruct critical task scenarios and identify high-load nodes and user experience variations. The Kano model is used to prioritise and classify user requirements, which are then translated into engineering characteristics through QFD. Based on this framework, a conceptual robot design is developed using the FBS model and evaluated through process-level simulation and usability assessment. The results demonstrate that the proposed method enables structured requirement transformation and supports traceable design decisions. Simulation indicates the consistency of task workflows and coordination among functional modules at the process level. A System Usability Scale score of 80.22 indicates a relatively high level of perceived usability at the conceptual evaluation stage. The proposed methodology provides a structured and traceable conceptual design framework for earthquake rescue robots. While the current validation is based on conceptual-level evaluation, the methodology offers a traceable design pathway that may be extended to other high-risk emergency equipment with further empirical testing.