Samaa Alotab

Bone metastasis is often treated clinically as a late complication of advanced cancer, yet accumulating evidence indicates that it is also a spatial evolutionary process shaped by clonal selection, niche adaptation, dormancy, and reseeding. This review examines BoM through a phylogeographic framework that links tumor ancestry with anatomical location and time. We discuss how heterogeneous primary tumors generate bone-tropic subclones, how circulating tumor cells pass through dissemination bottlenecks, and how disseminated tumor cells enter perivascular and endosteal niches that either maintain dormancy or support early micrometastatic outgrowth. We then compare clonal architectures across breast, prostate, lung, and renal cell carcinomas, emphasizing both lineage-specific programs and convergent bone-adaptive states, including osteomimicry, immune evasion, metabolic plasticity, and epigenetic remodeling. Methodological platforms such as multiregion sequencing, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, lineage tracing, and liquid biopsy are evaluated with attention to the technical limitations imposed by mineralized tissue. Finally, we consider how bone lesions may function as reservoirs for secondary dissemination and how evolutionary thinking could improve biomarker development, dormancy prediction, trial design, and therapy selection. Viewing BoM as an evolving ecosystem may help shift the field from reactive skeletal management toward earlier, biology-informed intervention.

Bone metastasis develops within a specialized marrow ecosystem where hematopoiesis, immune regulation, vascular trafficking, and skeletal remodeling intersect. Neutrophil-lineage cells occupy a unique position in this setting because they are generated, retained, mobilized, aged, and reprogrammed within the same bone marrow niches that disseminated tumor cells exploit for homing and survival. This review examines how neutrophils, tumor-associated neutrophils, immature neutrophils, low-density neutrophils, and PMN-MDSCs shape skeletal colonization. We discuss tumor-to-marrow signaling, CXCR2-dependent recruitment, CXCR4/CXCL12-mediated marrow retention, neutrophil–circulating tumor cell interactions, vascular arrest, dormancy escape, NET-mediated matrix remodeling, immune suppression, and effects on osteoclast–osteoblast coupling. Evidence is strongest in breast and prostate cancer models, where pathways such as CXCL5/CXCR2, CTNND1–CXCR4/CXCL12, PR3–RAGE, and DKK1–CKAP4–STAT6–CHI3L3 link neutrophil-lineage cells to skeletal progression and immunotherapy resistance. However, several mechanisms, including CTC–neutrophil clustering and NET-driven dormancy awakening, remain partly extrapolated from non-skeletal models. We therefore emphasize evidence hierarchy, methodological limitations, and therapeutic opportunities, arguing that selective reprogramming or functional inhibition of pro-metastatic neutrophil states may be more promising than indiscriminate neutrophil depletion in metastatic bone disease. A clearer understanding of these context-dependent neutrophil programs may help refine biomarker development and guide combination therapies for patients with skeletal metastases.

Bone metastasis remains a major cause of morbidity in advanced cancer, driven not only by tumor–bone crosstalk but also by profound immune remodeling within the marrow. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), including polymorphonuclear (PMN-MDSC) and monocytic (M-MDSC) subsets, are increasingly recognized as central effectors of this process, integrating inflammatory signals with metabolic and stromal cues to enforce immune suppression and support skeletal colonization. In this review, we synthesize current evidence that bone metastases transform the bone marrow into an “MDSC amplifier,” where vascular and endosteal niches, CXCL12-rich stromal compartments, hypoxia, and adipocyte-derived lipids collectively promote MDSC recruitment, persistence, and functional maturation. We discuss the dominant suppressive programs deployed by MDSCs in bone (e.g., arginase-1 activity, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species, and checkpoint ligand expression), and how these mechanisms converge to impair cytotoxic T-cell and NK-cell responses while fostering regulatory T-cell dominance. Importantly, because the marrow is a hematopoietic organ, bone lesions can also generate systemic consequences through myeloid spillover, providing a mechanistic basis for reduced responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade in bone-dominant disease. We then evaluate pharmacologic strategies to target MDSCs in the context of bone metastasis, including approaches that block trafficking (e.g., CCR2/CXCR2 axes), deplete or reprogram suppressive myeloid states (e.g., STAT3-directed strategies, differentiation therapy), and disrupt bone-resorptive feedback loops (e.g., receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) inhibition and bisphosphonates), emphasizing rational combinations and sequencing to limit marrow toxicity. Finally, we highlight emerging single-cell and spatial profiling tools that can resolve bone-specific heterogeneity in MDSCs and guide biomarker-driven, mechanism-informed therapeutic development.