ACAngely Catano

Angely Catano

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Angely Catano has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Alexis Sullivan

    Durham North Carolina 27701 FHI 360

    2 shared publications
  • Alicia Mendez

    Santo Domingo 10205 Two Oceans in Health

    2 shared publications
  • Bongeka Qiya

    Maternal, Adolescent, and Child Health Research Unit Johannesburg Gauteng University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    2 shared publications
  • Bongiwe Zulu

    Maternal, Adolescent, and Child Health Research Unit Johannesburg Gauteng University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    2 shared publications
  • Eunice Cuevas

    Santo Domingo 10205 Two Oceans in Health

    2 shared publications
  • Jenni Smit

    Maternal, Adolescent, and Child Health Research Unit Johannesburg Gauteng University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    “It brought to life the data:” Using a novel virtual affinity mapping technique for collaborative qualitative data analysis among global study teams

    by Stephanie Chung, Amelia Mackenzie, Jenni Smit, Marija Miric, Alison Edelman, Mags Beksinska, Angely Catano, Eunice Cuevas, Maddison Delacerda, Emily Hoppes, et al.


  • Open Access

    Defining a person-centered conceptual model to inform measurement of contraception’s effects on the menstrual cycle

    by Amelia Mackenzie, Jenni Smit, Marija Miric, Alison Edelman, Mags Beksinska, Angely Catano, Stephanie Chung, Eunice Cuevas, Maddison Delacerda, Marci Messerle Forbes, et al.

    Objective: To address the need for improved measurement of the ways contraception impacts the baseline menstrual cycle (i.e., contraceptive-induced menstrual changes; CIMCs) by assembling an interdisciplinary, global research collective to rigorously develop a person-centered measure for CIMCs in multiple languages. As the first step, this paper reports on our conceptual model development, which is the foundation for ongoing measure development. Study design: We conducted 18 focus groups with 106 people experiencing CIMCs while using hormonal or intrauterine contraception in Durban, South Africa, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Portland Oregon, United States. We used a virtual affinity mapping approach to analyze qualitative data, which was the basis of our conceptual model along with relevant theory and related models in the literature. Results: The conceptual model of experiences with CIMCs depicts the baseline menstrual cycle, including CIMCs and conceptually-linked effects and the impacts and perceptions of those CIMCs. We found key domains of changes in pain, bleeding volume, bleeding patterns, and characteristics of blood. Conclusion: Our CIMC conceptual model will inform development of a measure with evidence of validation across three language and global contexts. Adoption of a person-centered, standardized CIMC measurement across trials will improve knowledge and decision-making between methods. Implications: Defining an evidenced-based conceptual model for CIMCs expands our understanding of how contraceptive users experience and understand menstruation and CIMCs. We can use this model to improve and standardize measurement of CIMCs.