Tomoko Fujiyoshi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Tomoko Fujiyoshi has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Akihiro Funaoka
Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan
1 shared publication - Haruo Miwa
Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
1 shared publication - Hiromi Tsuchiya
Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan
1 shared publication - Kazuki Endo
Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan
1 shared publication - Kozue Shibasaki
Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan
1 shared publication - Kuniyasu Irie
Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (10) , 1443
Feasibility of Peroral Pancreatoscopy Using the 9-Fr eyeMAX for Surgical Planning in Main-Duct and Mixed-Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
Background/Objectives: The role of peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS) in patients with main-duct and mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MD/mixed-IPMN) remains unclear. This retrospective multicenter case series aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of POPS using the 9-Fr eyeMAX and to describe additional intraductal findings, potential surgical impact, and biopsy–surgery concordance. Methods: Consecutive patients with MD/mixed-IPMN in whom POPS was attempted between May 2023 and September 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Pre-POPS imaging findings, POPS findings, procedural outcomes, adverse events, surgical outcomes, and concordance between POPS-guided biopsy and surgical pathology were evaluated. Results: Among the 20 patients, 14 were men, and the median age was 74.5 years (range, 46–83 years). IPMNs were classified as main-duct type in five patients (25%) and mixed type in 15 (75%). On endoscopic ultrasonography, mural nodules were identified in 14 patients (70%), with a median diameter of 11 mm (range, 3–25 mm). Endoscopic papillary intervention was performed in 6 patients (30%). The technical success rate of POPS insertion was 95% (19/20). Mural nodules were detected by POPS in 17 patients (85%), and biopsy under POPS guidance was performed a median of 5 times (range, 1–10). The adequate tissue sampling rate was 86% (88/102). Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 1 patient (5%). Twelve patients (60%) underwent surgery. The concordance rate between POPS-targeted biopsy and surgical pathology was 45% (5/11); however, R0 resection was achieved in 11 patients (92%). Conclusions: In this small retrospective case series, POPS using the 9-Fr eyeMAX was feasible and provided additional intraductal information in selected patients. However, its diagnostic role remains adjunctive because POPS-guided biopsy showed limited reliability.
- 9 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (10) , 1443
Open AccessFeasibility of Peroral Pancreatoscopy Using the 9-Fr eyeMAX for Surgical Planning in Main-Duct and Mixed-Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
Background/Objectives: The role of peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS) in patients with main-duct and mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MD/mixed-IPMN) remains unclear. This retrospective multicenter case series aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of POPS using the 9-Fr eyeMAX and to describe additional intraductal findings, potential surgical impact, and biopsy–surgery concordance. Methods: Consecutive patients with MD/mixed-IPMN in whom POPS was attempted between May 2023 and September 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Pre-POPS imaging findings, POPS findings, procedural outcomes, adverse events, surgical outcomes, and concordance between POPS-guided biopsy and surgical pathology were evaluated. Results: Among the 20 patients, 14 were men, and the median age was 74.5 years (range, 46–83 years). IPMNs were classified as main-duct type in five patients (25%) and mixed type in 15 (75%). On endoscopic ultrasonography, mural nodules were identified in 14 patients (70%), with a median diameter of 11 mm (range, 3–25 mm). Endoscopic papillary intervention was performed in 6 patients (30%). The technical success rate of POPS insertion was 95% (19/20). Mural nodules were detected by POPS in 17 patients (85%), and biopsy under POPS guidance was performed a median of 5 times (range, 1–10). The adequate tissue sampling rate was 86% (88/102). Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 1 patient (5%). Twelve patients (60%) underwent surgery. The concordance rate between POPS-targeted biopsy and surgical pathology was 45% (5/11); however, R0 resection was achieved in 11 patients (92%). Conclusions: In this small retrospective case series, POPS using the 9-Fr eyeMAX was feasible and provided additional intraductal information in selected patients. However, its diagnostic role remains adjunctive because POPS-guided biopsy showed limited reliability.