Xingyang Bian
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Xingyang Bian has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jian Mi
Department of Transport Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
1 shared publication - Jun Zhang
Affiliation Department of Transportation Engineering, College of Architectural Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
1 shared publication - Shejun Deng
College of Architectural Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
1 shared publication - Shijun Yu
College of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
1 shared publication - Tao Ji
College of Architectural Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
1 shared publication - Yue Xu
College of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (10) , 4725
Coordinated Multi-Modal Transportation Optimization in Historic Urban Districts: A Protection–Renewal Perspective
The growing tension between heritage protection and transportation demands in historic urban districts poses significant planning challenges. This study addresses this issue by developing a multi-modal transportation coordination optimization model from a dual protection–renewal perspective. The model integrates three objectives—minimizing comprehensive impacts, maximizing traffic utility, and minimizing travel costs—encompassing both time and monetary expenditure. A linear weighting method is used to consolidate these into a single objective function, which is then solved with a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied to the historic urban districts of Yangzhou, China, the model evaluates and compares three typical policy-oriented transport development strategies: the protection strategy, the balanced strategy, and the renewal strategy. The protection strategy minimizes the comprehensive impact on the historic environment and total social costs, making it suitable for core areas with high conservation pressure. The balanced strategy achieves the optimal trade-off among comprehensive impact, traffic utility, and total cost, serving as a baseline for most historic districts. The renewal strategy, while improving traffic utility, significantly undermines historical integrity and increases total costs, and is therefore applicable only to peripheral areas with low protection pressure. The study concludes that strategy selection is inherently context-dependent, considering local heritage values, spatial constraints, and travel demand patterns. This method provides a transferable decision-support framework for sustainable transportation planning in historic urban districts.
- 10 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (10) , 4725
Open AccessCoordinated Multi-Modal Transportation Optimization in Historic Urban Districts: A Protection–Renewal Perspective
The growing tension between heritage protection and transportation demands in historic urban districts poses significant planning challenges. This study addresses this issue by developing a multi-modal transportation coordination optimization model from a dual protection–renewal perspective. The model integrates three objectives—minimizing comprehensive impacts, maximizing traffic utility, and minimizing travel costs—encompassing both time and monetary expenditure. A linear weighting method is used to consolidate these into a single objective function, which is then solved with a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied to the historic urban districts of Yangzhou, China, the model evaluates and compares three typical policy-oriented transport development strategies: the protection strategy, the balanced strategy, and the renewal strategy. The protection strategy minimizes the comprehensive impact on the historic environment and total social costs, making it suitable for core areas with high conservation pressure. The balanced strategy achieves the optimal trade-off among comprehensive impact, traffic utility, and total cost, serving as a baseline for most historic districts. The renewal strategy, while improving traffic utility, significantly undermines historical integrity and increases total costs, and is therefore applicable only to peripheral areas with low protection pressure. The study concludes that strategy selection is inherently context-dependent, considering local heritage values, spatial constraints, and travel demand patterns. This method provides a transferable decision-support framework for sustainable transportation planning in historic urban districts.