Jie Song
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Jie Song has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Haibo Liu
Guangzhou Kujiang Information Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510510, China
1 shared publication - Qiong Guo
College of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
1 shared publication - Shulao Liu
School of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
1 shared publication - Xueqing Wei
College of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
1 shared publication - Yidan Song
College of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (10) , 4894
The Design and Evaluation of an Age-Friendly Smart Bed Application: LDA-Driven Demand Mining and Multimodal Interaction
Age-friendly interaction design remains challenging in intelligent furniture applications, where complex interfaces and unreliable control may hinder middle-to-older adults’ safe operation and long-term acceptance. This study proposes a data-driven framework to support the design and evaluation of an age-friendly smart bed application by linking large-scale requirement mining, requirement-to-design translation, and controlled usability validation. First, large-scale e-commerce reviews (n = 20,174) were analyzed using LDA to identify dominant unmet needs. Key pain points clustered around interaction usability, information interpretability, and voice control reliability. Based on these findings, we developed an age-friendly smart bed app prototype. A within-subject usability study with 27 middle-to-older adults (55–65 years) compared the proposed system against a representative commercial reference application under standardized task protocols. The results showed significantly improved perceived usability, with a higher System Usability Scale (SUS) score (94.91 vs. 79.63, p < 0.001) and higher recommendation intention measured by overall NPS (59.52% vs. 34.39%). Beyond system-level usability improvement, this study makes three key contributions: (1) a reproducible ‘demand mining → design translation → empirical validation’ framework that bridges the methodological gaps in current intelligent furniture research; (2) operationalized mapping from LDA-derived user pain points to concrete multimodal interaction modules; and (3) empirical evidence from comparative usability testing with explicitly profiled middle-to-older adults (55–65 years) against a commercial reference system.
- 14 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (10) , 4894
Open AccessThe Design and Evaluation of an Age-Friendly Smart Bed Application: LDA-Driven Demand Mining and Multimodal Interaction
Age-friendly interaction design remains challenging in intelligent furniture applications, where complex interfaces and unreliable control may hinder middle-to-older adults’ safe operation and long-term acceptance. This study proposes a data-driven framework to support the design and evaluation of an age-friendly smart bed application by linking large-scale requirement mining, requirement-to-design translation, and controlled usability validation. First, large-scale e-commerce reviews (n = 20,174) were analyzed using LDA to identify dominant unmet needs. Key pain points clustered around interaction usability, information interpretability, and voice control reliability. Based on these findings, we developed an age-friendly smart bed app prototype. A within-subject usability study with 27 middle-to-older adults (55–65 years) compared the proposed system against a representative commercial reference application under standardized task protocols. The results showed significantly improved perceived usability, with a higher System Usability Scale (SUS) score (94.91 vs. 79.63, p < 0.001) and higher recommendation intention measured by overall NPS (59.52% vs. 34.39%). Beyond system-level usability improvement, this study makes three key contributions: (1) a reproducible ‘demand mining → design translation → empirical validation’ framework that bridges the methodological gaps in current intelligent furniture research; (2) operationalized mapping from LDA-derived user pain points to concrete multimodal interaction modules; and (3) empirical evidence from comparative usability testing with explicitly profiled middle-to-older adults (55–65 years) against a commercial reference system.