Paraskevi Danai Veltsista

Background/Objectives: Amplitude-modulated radiofrequency (AMRF) fields have emerged as promising non-temperature-induced strategies in oncology. While conventional hyperthermia (HT) relies on thermal stress, the biological impact of AMRF, particularly in combination with radiotherapy (RT), remains insufficiently characterized. Methods: We assessed RF and AMRF, alone or with RT, using phenotypic analyses of proliferation, apoptosis, and necrosis across four cancer cell lines (HT29, SW620, U343, U138). Transcriptomic profiling with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), GO:BP, and Reactome enrichment was performed in SW620 and U138 cells, selected for their strong phenotypic responses. Results: Across the panel, AMRF was associated with broader cytotoxic responses than RF or HT in most but not all cell lines. AMRF+RT produced the strongest necrotic responses, with cell-line-specific exceptions identified explicitly in the Results (the absence of a significant AMRF+RT apoptotic effect in SW620 and the absence of a significant AMRF+RT necrotic response in U343). In SW620 cells, AMRF was associated with extensive transcriptional reprogramming involving immune modulation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and cell cycle regulation, whereas RF alone showed narrower and delayed effects. In contrast, U138 cells showed elevated apoptosis and necrosis but limited transcriptional changes—a phenotype–transcriptome divergence that points to mechanisms operating downstream of transcription and warrants functional investigation in dedicated follow-up studies. Conclusions: AMRF and AMRF+RT emerge as promising non-temperature-induced anticancer modalities in the cell-line models profiled here, with the pattern of response varying between cell lines. These findings expand the biological impact of RF-based treatments and set the grounds for further investigation in mechanistic and translational studies.