Vasiliki Psalti
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Vasiliki Psalti has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Christos Triantos
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
1 shared publication - Ioanna Aggeletopoulou
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
1 shared publication - Ploutarchos Pastras
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceuticals
- Vol. 19 (5) , 783
Gut Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Differences in Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Treatment Implications
Alterations in the intestinal microbiota have been implicated in both irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, their biological significance and therapeutic implications differ substantially between the two conditions. Although dysbiosis is a common feature, the mechanisms by which alterations in the microbiota contribute to disease pathophysiology and clinical expression are distinct. Some pathways are more prominent in IBS (e.g., the gut–brain axis), whereas others are more prominent in IBD (e.g., reduced microbial diversity). Equally important are pathways that appear to play a role exclusively in IBD [e.g., Adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) and Paneth cells], as well as others that seem to be specific to IBS (e.g., mast cell activation). In IBD, microbiota changes are primarily linked to immune dysregulation, mucosal barrier impairment, and inflammation-driven pathways, whereas in IBS, they are mainly associated with functional disturbances mediated by neuroimmune signaling and microbial metabolites. Furthermore, several microbiome-associated biomarkers differ between these two diseases, and some are already assessed by international guidelines. Although the microbiota plays a key role in IBS and IBD pathophysiology, microbiome-based treatments remain limited, especially in IBD. There are clinically available treatments in IBS (e.g., rifaximin, low-FODMAP diet), but in IBD, only the probiotic VSL#3 is guideline-approved in ulcerative colitis pouchitis prophylaxis. Nevertheless, the dynamic nature of the microbiota continues to support the investigation of already studied (e.g., probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation) and potential novel therapeutic approaches at the research level. The aim of this review is to compare the gut-microbiota-related pathophysiological pathways and biomarkers between IBS and IBD, to summarize the microbiome-related medications that have already been studied in both diseases, and to suggest new potential therapeutic options based on the gut microbiota.
- 17 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceuticals
- Vol. 19 (5) , 783
Open AccessGut Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Differences in Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Treatment Implications
Alterations in the intestinal microbiota have been implicated in both irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, their biological significance and therapeutic implications differ substantially between the two conditions. Although dysbiosis is a common feature, the mechanisms by which alterations in the microbiota contribute to disease pathophysiology and clinical expression are distinct. Some pathways are more prominent in IBS (e.g., the gut–brain axis), whereas others are more prominent in IBD (e.g., reduced microbial diversity). Equally important are pathways that appear to play a role exclusively in IBD [e.g., Adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) and Paneth cells], as well as others that seem to be specific to IBS (e.g., mast cell activation). In IBD, microbiota changes are primarily linked to immune dysregulation, mucosal barrier impairment, and inflammation-driven pathways, whereas in IBS, they are mainly associated with functional disturbances mediated by neuroimmune signaling and microbial metabolites. Furthermore, several microbiome-associated biomarkers differ between these two diseases, and some are already assessed by international guidelines. Although the microbiota plays a key role in IBS and IBD pathophysiology, microbiome-based treatments remain limited, especially in IBD. There are clinically available treatments in IBS (e.g., rifaximin, low-FODMAP diet), but in IBD, only the probiotic VSL#3 is guideline-approved in ulcerative colitis pouchitis prophylaxis. Nevertheless, the dynamic nature of the microbiota continues to support the investigation of already studied (e.g., probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation) and potential novel therapeutic approaches at the research level. The aim of this review is to compare the gut-microbiota-related pathophysiological pathways and biomarkers between IBS and IBD, to summarize the microbiome-related medications that have already been studied in both diseases, and to suggest new potential therapeutic options based on the gut microbiota.