Ankesh Kumar
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Ankesh Kumar has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Prasoon Kumar Singh
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, India
1 shared publication - Ravi Prakash Kumar
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, India
1 shared publication - Rohit Patel
Department of Civil Engineering Gautam Buddha University Greater Noida India
1 shared publication - Shilpy Kumari
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad India
1 shared publication - Shivam Saw
Department of Chemical Engineering National Institute of Technology Durgapur India
1 shared publication - Vivek Kumar
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad India
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 13 May 2026
- Published by Wiley in Water Environment Research
- Vol. 98 (5) , e70401
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models in Groundwater Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review
Groundwater Quality (GWQ) presents a significant global concern owing to extensive agricultural and industrial activities, necessitating proficient management strategies, as it constitutes approximately half of the world's potable water supply. Traditional methods of monitoring water quality are valuable for identifying pollution sources, but they do not adequately provide an overall view of water quality trends. Machine learning (ML) technologies provide reliable predictions of water quality by learning complicated patterns from data without preconceived equations. This paper provides a meta‐analysis and bibliographic review of ML applications in GWQ assessment, evaluating the accuracy, applicability, and usability of various models including artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), k‐nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and deep learning (DL) (including deep neural networks [DNN] architectures) approaches. It offers a thorough synopsis and conclusion that neural networks have traditionally been the most widely used ML model in GWQ modelling. India, China, and the United States are global leaders in groundwater modelling, benefiting from extensive historical data. The most widely modelled elements are nitrate and heavy metal pollution, which are present in about half of the studies. Despite significant progress, several research gaps remain, particularly in the modelling of lesser‐explored water quality parameters and in the integration of advanced ML techniques. Emerging approaches such as physics‐informed machine learning (PIML), graph neural networks (GNNs), transformer‐based architectures, and large language models (LLMs) show considerable potential for improving prediction accuracy and handling complex environmental datasets. These advancements may enable more robust and integrated GWQ management frameworks in future studies.
- 13 May 2026
- Published by Wiley in Water Environment Research
- Vol. 98 (5) , e70401
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models in Groundwater Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review
Groundwater Quality (GWQ) presents a significant global concern owing to extensive agricultural and industrial activities, necessitating proficient management strategies, as it constitutes approximately half of the world's potable water supply. Traditional methods of monitoring water quality are valuable for identifying pollution sources, but they do not adequately provide an overall view of water quality trends. Machine learning (ML) technologies provide reliable predictions of water quality by learning complicated patterns from data without preconceived equations. This paper provides a meta‐analysis and bibliographic review of ML applications in GWQ assessment, evaluating the accuracy, applicability, and usability of various models including artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), k‐nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and deep learning (DL) (including deep neural networks [DNN] architectures) approaches. It offers a thorough synopsis and conclusion that neural networks have traditionally been the most widely used ML model in GWQ modelling. India, China, and the United States are global leaders in groundwater modelling, benefiting from extensive historical data. The most widely modelled elements are nitrate and heavy metal pollution, which are present in about half of the studies. Despite significant progress, several research gaps remain, particularly in the modelling of lesser‐explored water quality parameters and in the integration of advanced ML techniques. Emerging approaches such as physics‐informed machine learning (PIML), graph neural networks (GNNs), transformer‐based architectures, and large language models (LLMs) show considerable potential for improving prediction accuracy and handling complex environmental datasets. These advancements may enable more robust and integrated GWQ management frameworks in future studies.