Juan Usó-Canós

Juan Usó-Canós

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Juan Usó-Canós has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Enrique Isla

    Institut de Ciències del Mar-CSIC, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, Barcelona 08003, Spain

    6 shared publications
  • Isabelle Peeters

    Underwater Gardens International, Calle París 207, 2° 1ª, 08008 Barcelona, Spain

    6 shared publications
  • Karima López

    Innoceana, Calle El Picón, 47, 38687, Piedra Hincada, Tenerife, Spain

    6 shared publications
  • Enrique Isla

    Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37, 08003 Barcelona, Spain

    1 shared publication
  • Genuario Belmonte

    Laboratory of Zoogeography and Fauna, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy

    1 shared publication
  • Marco Anglano

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, LE, Italy

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Blue carbon development and ecosystem services in oligotrophic environments: the case for a shallow coastal installation on the shelf off Tenerife (Canary Islands)

    by Juan Usó-Canós, Enrique Isla, Isabelle Peeters, Karima López

    This study assessed the unplanned ecosystem services provided by a submarine monitoring station over 18 months, including an environmental characterisation of a shallow coastal shelf area off SW Tenerife (Canary Islands), a calculation of the benthic biomass developed (the generated blue carbon) and the identification of the species pool related to the installation, representing the associated biodiversity. The oligotrophic coastal waters at the studied site permitted a benthic biomass generation between 1.02 and 2.88 g m −2 , and a carbon sequestration between 0.24 and 0.40 g m −2 . Furthermore, 46 species belonging to 11 phyla were identified during 4 periodical monitoring dives. The ecosystem services provided by the monitoring station included primary production, carbon sequestration, fish nursery and shelter (regulating ecosystem service). The installation also benefited the biodiversity maintenance (regulating and maintenance ecosystem service). The environmental conditions (physical, chemical and biological) at the studied site were not a limiting factor for benthic biomass development. The amount of blue carbon generated was lower compared to the main blue carbon ecosystems (e.g., seagrass meadows, mangroves and salt marshes) and high-latitude (polar) ecosystems, but similar to Mediterranean gorgonian-based ecosystems. Our study demonstrates that the present oligotrophic study site is a good candidate for benthic ecosystem restoration due to its facility for blue carbon development and provision of ecosystem services.

  • Open Access

    Reply on RC2

    by Juan Usó-Canós, Enrique Isla, Isabelle Peeters, Karima López

    This study assessed the unplanned ecosystem services provided by a submarine monitoring station over 18 months, including an environmental characterisation of a shallow coastal shelf area off SW Tenerife (Canary Islands), a calculation of the benthic biomass developed (the generated blue carbon) and the identification of the species pool related to the installation, representing the associated biodiversity. The oligotrophic coastal waters at the studied site permitted a benthic biomass generation between 1.02 g m-2 and 2.88 g m-2, and a carbon sequestration between 0.24 g m-2 and 0.40 g m-2. Furthermore, 46 species belonging to 11 phyla were identified during 4 periodical monitoring dives. The ecosystem services provided by the monitoring station included primary production, carbon sequestration, fish nursery and shelter (regulating ecosystem service). The installation also benefited the biodiversity maintenance (supporting ecosystem service). The environmental conditions (physical, chemical and biological) at the studied site were not a limiting factor for benthic biomass development. The amount of blue carbon generated was lower compared to the main blue carbon ecosystems (e.g., seagrass meadows, mangroves and salt marshes) and high-latitude (polar) ecosystems, but similar to Mediterranean gorgonian-based ecosystems. The present study demonstrates that the present oligotrophic study site is a good candidate for benthic ecosystem restoration due to its facility for blue carbon development and provision of ecosystem services.

  • Open Access

    Comment on egusphere-2026-2754

    by Juan Usó-Canós, Enrique Isla, Isabelle Peeters, Karima López

    This study assessed the unplanned ecosystem services provided by a submarine monitoring station over 18 months, including an environmental characterisation of a shallow coastal shelf area off SW Tenerife (Canary Islands), a calculation of the benthic biomass developed (the generated blue carbon) and the identification of the species pool related to the installation, representing the associated biodiversity. The oligotrophic coastal waters at the studied site permitted a benthic biomass generation between 1.02 g m-2 and 2.88 g m-2, and a carbon sequestration between 0.24 g m-2 and 0.40 g m-2. Furthermore, 46 species belonging to 11 phyla were identified during 4 periodical monitoring dives. The ecosystem services provided by the monitoring station included primary production, carbon sequestration, fish nursery and shelter (regulating ecosystem service). The installation also benefited the biodiversity maintenance (supporting ecosystem service). The environmental conditions (physical, chemical and biological) at the studied site were not a limiting factor for benthic biomass development. The amount of blue carbon generated was lower compared to the main blue carbon ecosystems (e.g., seagrass meadows, mangroves and salt marshes) and high-latitude (polar) ecosystems, but similar to Mediterranean gorgonian-based ecosystems. The present study demonstrates that the present oligotrophic study site is a good candidate for benthic ecosystem restoration due to its facility for blue carbon development and provision of ecosystem services.

  • Open Access

    Reply on RC1

    by Juan Usó-Canós, Enrique Isla, Isabelle Peeters, Karima López

    This study assessed the unplanned ecosystem services provided by a submarine monitoring station over 18 months, including an environmental characterisation of a shallow coastal shelf area off SW Tenerife (Canary Islands), a calculation of the benthic biomass developed (the generated blue carbon) and the identification of the species pool related to the installation, representing the associated biodiversity. The oligotrophic coastal waters at the studied site permitted a benthic biomass generation between 1.02 g m-2 and 2.88 g m-2, and a carbon sequestration between 0.24 g m-2 and 0.40 g m-2. Furthermore, 46 species belonging to 11 phyla were identified during 4 periodical monitoring dives. The ecosystem services provided by the monitoring station included primary production, carbon sequestration, fish nursery and shelter (regulating ecosystem service). The installation also benefited the biodiversity maintenance (supporting ecosystem service). The environmental conditions (physical, chemical and biological) at the studied site were not a limiting factor for benthic biomass development. The amount of blue carbon generated was lower compared to the main blue carbon ecosystems (e.g., seagrass meadows, mangroves and salt marshes) and high-latitude (polar) ecosystems, but similar to Mediterranean gorgonian-based ecosystems. The present study demonstrates that the present oligotrophic study site is a good candidate for benthic ecosystem restoration due to its facility for blue carbon development and provision of ecosystem services.

  • Open Access

    Annual Cycle of the Mesozooplankton in Oligotrophic Waters off Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)

    by Marco Anglano, Genuario Belmonte, Enrique Isla, Juan Usó-Canós, Sergio Rossi

    Mesozooplankton were studied monthly (September 2023–August 2024, 12 months) at two coastal stations, at 35 and 90 m water depth, off Punta Blanca, SW Tenerife, Canary archipelago. Sample collection involved 250 and 500 μm bongo nets. This research focused on improving the description of plankton biodiversity and dynamics of the Canary archipelago (Macaronesia area), including its role in the transport of particulate carbon. A total of 156 taxa were identified. Copepoda dominated with 85 taxa, including 72 Calanoida species. They were numerically followed by Appendicularia, Chaetognatha, and Hydrozoa. Mesh sizes varied in collection efficiency, but with a similar pattern during the annual cycle: abundance peaks in early autumn (October–November) and late winter–spring (February–April). The 35 m depth station showed 57 to 3809 ind. m−3 (250 μm mesh size) and 10 to 1577 ind. m−3 (500 μm). The 90 m depth station showed 22 to 402 ind. m−3 (250 μm) and 11 to 170 ind. m−3 (500 μm). The present study enhances our understanding of Macaronesia’s mesozooplankton dynamics related to environmental variability, which is crucial for energy transfer assessments in pelagic food webs. It reports new species for the study area, Labidocera acutifrons (Dana, 1849–1852) and Undinula vulgaris (Dana, 1849–1852), highlighting the need for consistent zooplankton monitoring to properly inform conservation and sustainable management actions in the region.

  • Open Access

    Blue carbon development and ecosystem services in oligotrophic environments: the case for a shallow coastal installation on the shelf off Tenerife (Canary Islands)

    by Juan Usó-Canós, Enrique Isla, Isabelle Peeters, Karima López

    This study assessed the unplanned ecosystem services provided by a submarine monitoring station over 18 months, including an environmental characterisation of a shallow coastal shelf area off SW Tenerife (Canary Islands), a calculation of the benthic biomass developed (the generated blue carbon) and the identification of the species pool related to the installation, representing the associated biodiversity. The oligotrophic coastal waters at the studied site permitted a benthic biomass generation between 1.02 g m-2 and 2.88 g m-2, and a carbon sequestration between 0.24 g m-2 and 0.40 g m-2. Furthermore, 46 species belonging to 11 phyla were identified during 4 periodical monitoring dives. The ecosystem services provided by the monitoring station included primary production, carbon sequestration, fish nursery and shelter (regulating ecosystem service). The installation also benefited the biodiversity maintenance (supporting ecosystem service). The environmental conditions (physical, chemical and biological) at the studied site were not a limiting factor for benthic biomass development. The amount of blue carbon generated was lower compared to the main blue carbon ecosystems (e.g., seagrass meadows, mangroves and salt marshes) and high-latitude (polar) ecosystems, but similar to Mediterranean gorgonian-based ecosystems. The present study demonstrates that the present oligotrophic study site is a good candidate for benthic ecosystem restoration due to its facility for blue carbon development and provision of ecosystem services.