Cheol-Woo Lim
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Cheol-Woo Lim has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chi-Wook Oh
Satellite Technology Research Center (SaTReC), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Chol Lee
Satellite Technology Research Center (SaTReC), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Gilsun Jang
Spatial Information Industry Promotion Agency, Seongnam-si 13487, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Jisang Yoon
Satellite Technology Research Center (SaTReC), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Jueon Park
GEO-Satellite System Engineering Team, LIG Defense & Aerospace Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si 13488, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Junchan Lee
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) SaTReC, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (12) , 1943
From Optical Design to NIIRS and Object Detection: An Integrated Framework for Spatial Image Quality Assessment of Micro-Satellite Constellations
For micro-satellite constellations, frequent Earth observation alone does not guarantee archive usability; the archive is operationally useful only when the spatial image quality remains adequate for downstream exploitation. This study presents an integrated framework for assessing spatial image quality using NEONSAT-1 imagery by linking optical design analysis, image simulation, GIQE-based NIIRS estimation, and YOLOv8-based object detection within a single workflow. NEONSAT-1 panchromatic (PAN), pan-sharpened (PS), and multispectral (MS) products were analyzed together with controlled simulations of system MTF, altitude-dependent GSD variation, and super-resolution processing. Among the native products, PS imagery showed the highest NIIRS and overall detection performance. In the controlled experiments, higher system MTF increased RER and NIIRS, while lower simulated altitude generally produced finer GSD and higher NIIRS for both PS and PAN products. However, detection performance varied by scene, product type, and target class and did not increase in direct proportion to NIIRS. In the super-resolution case study, ×2 SR provided the most consistent NIIRS improvement, whereas detection responses at higher SR scales were target class dependent. These results suggest that spatial image quality should be evaluated not only through interpretability metrics such as NIIRS but also in relation to practical downstream performance. The proposed framework provides a baseline for future constellation-scale image quality assessment.
- 11 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (12) , 1943
Open AccessFrom Optical Design to NIIRS and Object Detection: An Integrated Framework for Spatial Image Quality Assessment of Micro-Satellite Constellations
For micro-satellite constellations, frequent Earth observation alone does not guarantee archive usability; the archive is operationally useful only when the spatial image quality remains adequate for downstream exploitation. This study presents an integrated framework for assessing spatial image quality using NEONSAT-1 imagery by linking optical design analysis, image simulation, GIQE-based NIIRS estimation, and YOLOv8-based object detection within a single workflow. NEONSAT-1 panchromatic (PAN), pan-sharpened (PS), and multispectral (MS) products were analyzed together with controlled simulations of system MTF, altitude-dependent GSD variation, and super-resolution processing. Among the native products, PS imagery showed the highest NIIRS and overall detection performance. In the controlled experiments, higher system MTF increased RER and NIIRS, while lower simulated altitude generally produced finer GSD and higher NIIRS for both PS and PAN products. However, detection performance varied by scene, product type, and target class and did not increase in direct proportion to NIIRS. In the super-resolution case study, ×2 SR provided the most consistent NIIRS improvement, whereas detection responses at higher SR scales were target class dependent. These results suggest that spatial image quality should be evaluated not only through interpretability metrics such as NIIRS but also in relation to practical downstream performance. The proposed framework provides a baseline for future constellation-scale image quality assessment.