Jiao Lu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Jiao Lu has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dan Li
Hubei Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Wuhan 430061, China
1 shared publication - Huan Deng
School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Sciences, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
1 shared publication - Qianru Li
School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
1 shared publication - Songwei Tan
School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceutics
- Vol. 18 (6) , 752
Genetic Interruption of PD-1/PD-L1 as an Alternative Means for Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer: A Review
Background/Objectives: Immune checkpoints are critical regulatory pathways that maintain peripheral tolerance and prevent autoimmunity. Among these, the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis serves as a major inhibitory pathway that terminates T cell responses. While protein-based checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting this axis has revolutionized clinical cancer therapy, its clinical efficacy is frequently limited by low response rates, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the emergence of adaptive resistance. To break through these bottlenecks, genetic interruption has emerged as a high-precision alternative to modulate the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway at the nucleotide level. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of literature was performed across major databases (PubMed, Web of Science), with a focus on high quality studies published up to 2026. Results: Direct genomic disruption via CRISPR/Cas9 and post-transcriptional silencing through RNA interference can effectively neutralize inhibitory signaling at its source. Recent advances demonstrate that targeting upstream regulatory nodes—including metabolic checkpoints (e.g., lactate metabolism) and biophysical mechanisms (e.g., liquid–liquid phase separation)—provides superior transcriptional control over PD-L1. Furthermore, engineering CAR-T cells with multiplex gene editing (e.g., TCR/B2M/PD-1 knockout) or localized scFv secretion significantly enhances antitumor potency while reducing systemic toxicity. Innovations in organ-targeted lipid nanoparticles and stimuli-responsive biomimetic carriers further address the delivery barriers in solid tumors. Conclusions: Gene therapy provides a high-precision platform for PD-1/PD-L1 modulation, offering a viable strategy to overcome adaptive resistance. Future clinical application depends on the refinement of safer editing tools, such as base editing, and the standardization of intelligent delivery systems to ensure controllable and scalable cancer immunotherapy.
- 18 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceutics
- Vol. 18 (6) , 752
Open AccessGenetic Interruption of PD-1/PD-L1 as an Alternative Means for Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer: A Review
Background/Objectives: Immune checkpoints are critical regulatory pathways that maintain peripheral tolerance and prevent autoimmunity. Among these, the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis serves as a major inhibitory pathway that terminates T cell responses. While protein-based checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting this axis has revolutionized clinical cancer therapy, its clinical efficacy is frequently limited by low response rates, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the emergence of adaptive resistance. To break through these bottlenecks, genetic interruption has emerged as a high-precision alternative to modulate the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway at the nucleotide level. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of literature was performed across major databases (PubMed, Web of Science), with a focus on high quality studies published up to 2026. Results: Direct genomic disruption via CRISPR/Cas9 and post-transcriptional silencing through RNA interference can effectively neutralize inhibitory signaling at its source. Recent advances demonstrate that targeting upstream regulatory nodes—including metabolic checkpoints (e.g., lactate metabolism) and biophysical mechanisms (e.g., liquid–liquid phase separation)—provides superior transcriptional control over PD-L1. Furthermore, engineering CAR-T cells with multiplex gene editing (e.g., TCR/B2M/PD-1 knockout) or localized scFv secretion significantly enhances antitumor potency while reducing systemic toxicity. Innovations in organ-targeted lipid nanoparticles and stimuli-responsive biomimetic carriers further address the delivery barriers in solid tumors. Conclusions: Gene therapy provides a high-precision platform for PD-1/PD-L1 modulation, offering a viable strategy to overcome adaptive resistance. Future clinical application depends on the refinement of safer editing tools, such as base editing, and the standardization of intelligent delivery systems to ensure controllable and scalable cancer immunotherapy.