Emanuele Clemente

Reliable rainfall information is fundamental for climate-risk analysis and operational monitoring in Mediterranean regions such as Apulia (Southern Italy), one of the areas most affected by climate change-driven shifts in rainfall patterns. Recent evaluations across Italy and comparable Mediterranean settings consistently show that gridded precipitation performance is highly dependent on orography and dataset typology: reanalyses often provide the best overall agreement with gauges, while satellite and blended products can exhibit larger biases, with persistent challenges in complex terrain and for high-intensity events. In this context—and given the documented spatial heterogeneity of rainfall extremes within Apulia—validation of such gridded datasets with respect to ground observations remains essential for early warning and climatological applications. In the present work, we evaluate four widely used precipitation products—CHIRPS-v2, the newly released CHIRPS-v3, IMERG, and ERA5—benchmarking them against the Apulia region Civil Protection rain-gauge network. We provide diagnostics aligned with early warning and climate monitoring: bias and error statistics, rainfall intensity distributions, and dry spell duration. A key contribution is, to our knowledge, the first dedicated validation of CHIRPS-v3 in Apulia, which is timely given that CHIRPS-v3 was explicitly developed to address shortcomings such as underestimated temporal variance and to leverage expanded station inputs. The results indicate that CHIRPS-v3 yields systematic improvements over CHIRPS-v2 across multiple metrics, while ERA5 generally shows the strongest overall agreement with gauges—consistent with broader Italian evidence.