Xin Chen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Xin Chen has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Haodong Zou
Information & Telecommunication Branch, State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210009, China
2 shared publications - Jinghang Yu
Information & Telecommunication Branch, State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210009, China
2 shared publications - Luokai Jiang
School of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2 shared publications - Ling Wang
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Information & Telecommunication Branch, Nanjing 210009, China
1 shared publication - Ling Wang
Information & Telecommunication Branch, State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210009, China
1 shared publication - Long Yuan
Wuhan University of Technology
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Algorithms
- Vol. 19 (9) , 720
LTFP: Lead-Time-Aware Failure Prediction Based on Service GNNs for AIOps
Failures in cloud-native systems can disrupt service availability and system reliability, while their early symptoms are often weak and dispersed across metrics, logs, traces, and interdependent services. Existing methods commonly flatten heterogeneous telemetry or model monitoring variables without preserving service identities. We propose LTFP, a lead-time-aware failure-prediction framework whose graph nodes represent services. LTFP uses modality-specific temporal encoders and gated fusion to form service states, as well as an edge-weight-aware Graph Attention Network to propagate these states over a sparse hybrid graph constructed from known dependencies and training-fitted correlations. Joint graph-level and node-level heads predict whether a failure will occur within a configured future window and rank likely responsible services. We evaluate LTFP on seven subsets from three representative cloud-native systems. Comparisons with representative source-code baselines are reported at the pipeline level, with each method retaining its original learning objective and input configuration. At the 600 s prediction-window setting, LTFP obtains a macro-average window-level precision, recall, and F1 of 92.0%, 90.4%, and 90.5%, respectively. Together with the localization and ablation results, these findings support the effectiveness of service-centered multimodal modeling under the evaluated protocol.
- 26 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Algorithms
- Vol. 19 (9) , 720
Open AccessLTFP: Lead-Time-Aware Failure Prediction Based on Service GNNs for AIOps
Failures in cloud-native systems can disrupt service availability and system reliability, while their early symptoms are often weak and dispersed across metrics, logs, traces, and interdependent services. Existing methods commonly flatten heterogeneous telemetry or model monitoring variables without preserving service identities. We propose LTFP, a lead-time-aware failure-prediction framework whose graph nodes represent services. LTFP uses modality-specific temporal encoders and gated fusion to form service states, as well as an edge-weight-aware Graph Attention Network to propagate these states over a sparse hybrid graph constructed from known dependencies and training-fitted correlations. Joint graph-level and node-level heads predict whether a failure will occur within a configured future window and rank likely responsible services. We evaluate LTFP on seven subsets from three representative cloud-native systems. Comparisons with representative source-code baselines are reported at the pipeline level, with each method retaining its original learning objective and input configuration. At the 600 s prediction-window setting, LTFP obtains a macro-average window-level precision, recall, and F1 of 92.0%, 90.4%, and 90.5%, respectively. Together with the localization and ablation results, these findings support the effectiveness of service-centered multimodal modeling under the evaluated protocol.
- Open Access
LLM-Guided Graph Structure Learning for Alert Convergence in AIOps
In modern cloud-native systems, a single root cause can trigger cascading anomalies across multiple entities (e.g., microservices, databases, and hosts), generating alert storms with hundreds or thousands of heterogeneous alerts. Alert convergence (automatically grouping these alerts into actionable incident tickets) is critical for reducing operator burden and recovery time. Existing graph-based methods construct a topological graph from known entity dependencies and then leverage Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for information propagation, but they rely on static physical topologies that fail to capture implicit fault propagation paths. Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods focus on reasoning about the textual information of alerts, yet they do not incorporate global topological structure and struggle with consistency at scale. Motivated by these limitations, we propose LLM-Guided Graph Structure Learning (LLM-GSL), a novel framework that combines the semantic reasoning ability of LLMs with the structural modeling power of GNNs for alert convergence. Specifically, LLM-GSL first leverages an LLM to evaluate pairwise entity relationships and discover implicit fault propagation paths that are absent from static topologies, thereby enhancing the physical-topology graph into a more complete structure. A Graph Attention Network (GAT) then refines alert representations over this enhanced graph via graph message passing, guided by a self-supervised graph affinity loss with continuous multi-modal supervision targets that fuse adjacency structure, textual affinity, and temporal affinity. Finally, density-based clustering groups the learned representations into incident tickets. Experiments on five public datasets, including four LogHub-derived datasets and one RCAEval microservice fault-injection subset, demonstrate that LLM-GSL achieves an average F1-score of 96.2%, outperforming six baselines including both traditional clustering and LLM-based methods by at least 14.0 percentage points.
Open AccessLLM-Guided Graph Structure Learning for Alert Convergence in AIOps
In modern cloud-native systems, a single root cause can trigger cascading anomalies across multiple entities (e.g., microservices, databases, and hosts), generating alert storms with hundreds or thousands of heterogeneous alerts. Alert convergence (automatically grouping these alerts into actionable incident tickets) is critical for reducing operator burden and recovery time. Existing graph-based methods construct a topological graph from known entity dependencies and then leverage Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for information propagation, but they rely on static physical topologies that fail to capture implicit fault propagation paths. Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods focus on reasoning about the textual information of alerts, yet they do not incorporate global topological structure and struggle with consistency at scale. Motivated by these limitations, we propose LLM-Guided Graph Structure Learning (LLM-GSL), a novel framework that combines the semantic reasoning ability of LLMs with the structural modeling power of GNNs for alert convergence. Specifically, LLM-GSL first leverages an LLM to evaluate pairwise entity relationships and discover implicit fault propagation paths that are absent from static topologies, thereby enhancing the physical-topology graph into a more complete structure. A Graph Attention Network (GAT) then refines alert representations over this enhanced graph via graph message passing, guided by a self-supervised graph affinity loss with continuous multi-modal supervision targets that fuse adjacency structure, textual affinity, and temporal affinity. Finally, density-based clustering groups the learned representations into incident tickets. Experiments on five public datasets, including four LogHub-derived datasets and one RCAEval microservice fault-injection subset, demonstrate that LLM-GSL achieves an average F1-score of 96.2%, outperforming six baselines including both traditional clustering and LLM-based methods by at least 14.0 percentage points.