Xiaoyi Hu
Xiaoyi Hu
*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Xiaoyi Hu has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Min Gan
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
1 shared publication - Xiaofeng Liao
School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China
1 shared publication - Zaiyi Liao
Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
1 shared publication - Zhizhi Wang
School of Urban Construction Engineering, Chongqing Technology and Business Institute, Chongqing 400085, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Predicting Hydration Degree in Cementitious Systems Blended with Slag and Fly Ash
Accurately predicting the degree of hydration in cement systems blended with slag and fly ash is difficult when experimental data are limited. Empirical kinetic models typically need recalibration for each specific blend, while purely data-driven approaches often fail to maintain physical consistency. In this work, we present a physics-informed neural network for predicting isothermal hydration by incorporating the Avrami–Erofeev–Arrhenius ordinary differential equation into the training loss and using a composition-focused sub-network to relate blend proportions to blend-specific kinetic parameters. The model was trained and tested on 29,379 calorimetry data points from 77 multi-component cement systems gathered from two open-access datasets. For previously unseen test systems, it reached an of 0.9864 and a symmetric mean absolute percentage error (sMAPE) of 25.3%. Its overall sMAPE was lower than that of a neural network with the same architecture but without physics-based constraints (34.9%); stage-resolved analysis showed that the largest difference occurred during early hydration. Across eight random seeds, the physics constraint did not confer a data-efficiency or training-stability advantage over the same-architecture network. The distinguishing features of the PINN are instead its explicit ODE and monotonicity regularization and its composition-conditioned effective parameters. Although random forest regression produced lower pointwise error, it failed to maintain physically consistent hydration-rate behavior. Overall, the framework provides a composition-conditioned surrogate that incorporates kinetic regularization within the composition range investigated.Open AccessPhysics-Informed Neural Networks for Predicting Hydration Degree in Cementitious Systems Blended with Slag and Fly Ash
Accurately predicting the degree of hydration in cement systems blended with slag and fly ash is difficult when experimental data are limited. Empirical kinetic models typically need recalibration for each specific blend, while purely data-driven approaches often fail to maintain physical consistency. In this work, we present a physics-informed neural network for predicting isothermal hydration by incorporating the Avrami–Erofeev–Arrhenius ordinary differential equation into the training loss and using a composition-focused sub-network to relate blend proportions to blend-specific kinetic parameters. The model was trained and tested on 29,379 calorimetry data points from 77 multi-component cement systems gathered from two open-access datasets. For previously unseen test systems, it reached an of 0.9864 and a symmetric mean absolute percentage error (sMAPE) of 25.3%. Its overall sMAPE was lower than that of a neural network with the same architecture but without physics-based constraints (34.9%); stage-resolved analysis showed that the largest difference occurred during early hydration. Across eight random seeds, the physics constraint did not confer a data-efficiency or training-stability advantage over the same-architecture network. The distinguishing features of the PINN are instead its explicit ODE and monotonicity regularization and its composition-conditioned effective parameters. Although random forest regression produced lower pointwise error, it failed to maintain physically consistent hydration-rate behavior. Overall, the framework provides a composition-conditioned surrogate that incorporates kinetic regularization within the composition range investigated.