Je-Kyum Lee
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Je-Kyum Lee has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chang-Yong Kim
Department of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Gi-Jun Lee
Department of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Han-Eol Kim
Department of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Ji-Seok Yun
Department of Smartcity Engineering, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Wan-Kyu Yoo
Department of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Young-Suk Song
Geo-Environmental Hazard Research Center, Geologic Environment Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 July 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (14) , 6951
Prediction and Generalization Capability of Machine Learning Models for Shield TBM-Induced Settlement
Ground settlement induced by shield tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation is a major geotechnical concern in urban tunneling because it may affect the safety of adjacent structures and underground infrastructure. In this study, machine learning models were developed to predict the maximum settlement induced by shield TBM excavation using a three-dimensional numerical analysis database comprising 320 simulation cases generated from combinations of tunnel diameter (D), ground elastic modulus (E), face pressure (FP), and backfill pressure (BP). Random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were developed and compared with an existing regression-based settlement prediction equation. Predictive performance and generalization capability were evaluated using random split and GroupKFold validation techniques. Under random split validation, RF achieved the highest predictive performance, with a coefficient of determination of 0.997 and a root mean square error of 0.438 mm, followed by XGBoost. Both machine learning models outperformed the existing settlement prediction equation. However, model performance decreased substantially under GroupKFold validation, indicating limited generalization capability under unseen D–E grouped conditions. The results demonstrate that the developed machine learning models provide accurate predictions within the range of tunnel–ground conditions represented by the adopted numerical analysis database. The findings highlight the importance of evaluating both predictive performance and generalization capability, particularly when machine learning models developed from numerical analysis databases are applied beyond the conditions represented in the training database.
- 10 July 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (14) , 6951
Open AccessPrediction and Generalization Capability of Machine Learning Models for Shield TBM-Induced Settlement
Ground settlement induced by shield tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation is a major geotechnical concern in urban tunneling because it may affect the safety of adjacent structures and underground infrastructure. In this study, machine learning models were developed to predict the maximum settlement induced by shield TBM excavation using a three-dimensional numerical analysis database comprising 320 simulation cases generated from combinations of tunnel diameter (D), ground elastic modulus (E), face pressure (FP), and backfill pressure (BP). Random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were developed and compared with an existing regression-based settlement prediction equation. Predictive performance and generalization capability were evaluated using random split and GroupKFold validation techniques. Under random split validation, RF achieved the highest predictive performance, with a coefficient of determination of 0.997 and a root mean square error of 0.438 mm, followed by XGBoost. Both machine learning models outperformed the existing settlement prediction equation. However, model performance decreased substantially under GroupKFold validation, indicating limited generalization capability under unseen D–E grouped conditions. The results demonstrate that the developed machine learning models provide accurate predictions within the range of tunnel–ground conditions represented by the adopted numerical analysis database. The findings highlight the importance of evaluating both predictive performance and generalization capability, particularly when machine learning models developed from numerical analysis databases are applied beyond the conditions represented in the training database.