Dohyeon Park
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Dohyeon Park has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dae-Eun Kang
Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications - Dooyoung Jeong
Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications - Hyeokjin Kweon
Department of Satellite Systems, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications - Jaeheon Cheong
Department of Satellite Systems, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications - Sang-Young Park
Department of Satellite Systems, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications - Youngho Eun
Department of Satellite Systems, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Correction: Park et al. Verification and Testing of a Resource-Constrained CubeSat: On-Orbit Results and Lessons Learned from COSMIC. Aerospace 2026, 13, 654
The authors have made the following corrections to the author list and the content of the original publication
Open AccessCorrection: Park et al. Verification and Testing of a Resource-Constrained CubeSat: On-Orbit Results and Lessons Learned from COSMIC. Aerospace 2026, 13, 654
The authors have made the following corrections to the author list and the content of the original publication
- Open Access
Verification and Testing of a Resource-Constrained CubeSat: On-Orbit Results and Lessons Learned from COSMIC
CubeSat programs are often conducted under severe constraints in budget, personnel, schedule, and knowledge continuity, while still requiring sufficient verification to support mission success. This paper presents the verification, testing, on-orbit operation, and anomaly analysis of COSMIC, a 3U CubeSat jointly developed by Yonsei University, Unmanned Exploration Laboratory (UEL), and UZURO Tech Inc. in less than eleven months from project kickoff to launch. COSMIC adopted a protoflight model approach, prioritized commercial off-the-shelf components with flight heritage and prior laboratory experience, and concentrated limited resources on subsystem, FlatSat, system-level, environmental, communication, and scenario-based testing. The test program is reviewed against the subsequent on-orbit results to identify which verification activities contributed to anomaly prevention, fault isolation, and recovery. The results show that system-level integration testing, thermal vacuum cycle testing, and scenario testing were particularly effective in revealing interface, software, and deployment-related issues before launch and in supporting early orbit recovery. However, the mission also exposed limitations in recovery-logic verification, long-duration software testing, communication robustness, and independent reset paths. Based on these findings, practical recommendations are derived for resource-constrained CubeSat teams seeking to tailor verification activities without simply reducing test rigor.
Open AccessVerification and Testing of a Resource-Constrained CubeSat: On-Orbit Results and Lessons Learned from COSMIC
CubeSat programs are often conducted under severe constraints in budget, personnel, schedule, and knowledge continuity, while still requiring sufficient verification to support mission success. This paper presents the verification, testing, on-orbit operation, and anomaly analysis of COSMIC, a 3U CubeSat jointly developed by Yonsei University, Unmanned Exploration Laboratory (UEL), and UZURO Tech Inc. in less than eleven months from project kickoff to launch. COSMIC adopted a protoflight model approach, prioritized commercial off-the-shelf components with flight heritage and prior laboratory experience, and concentrated limited resources on subsystem, FlatSat, system-level, environmental, communication, and scenario-based testing. The test program is reviewed against the subsequent on-orbit results to identify which verification activities contributed to anomaly prevention, fault isolation, and recovery. The results show that system-level integration testing, thermal vacuum cycle testing, and scenario testing were particularly effective in revealing interface, software, and deployment-related issues before launch and in supporting early orbit recovery. However, the mission also exposed limitations in recovery-logic verification, long-duration software testing, communication robustness, and independent reset paths. Based on these findings, practical recommendations are derived for resource-constrained CubeSat teams seeking to tailor verification activities without simply reducing test rigor.