Christian Munch Hagen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Christian Munch Hagen has a total of 35 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alma Toromanović
Department of Pediatrics, University Clinical Center Tuzla, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 shared publication - David Cheillan
Service Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69002 Lyon, France
1 shared publication - Dianne Webster
Newborn Metabolic Screening Programme, Lab Plus, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland 1140, New Zealand
1 shared publication - Florentina Moldovanu
National Institute for Mother and Child Health “Alessandrescu-Rusescu”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
1 shared publication - François Boemer
CHU Liege, 4000 Liège, Belgium
1 shared publication - Giancarlo la Marca
Newborn Screening, Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Pharmacy Lab Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Neonatal Screening
- Vol. 12 (3) , 64
Features and Legal Practice of Dried Blood Spot Card Biobanking in Europe: Balancing Research Potential with Parental and Children’s Rights
Neonatal screening using Dried Blood Spot (DBS) cards is an important and successful public health facility in Europe, enabling early detection of congenital disorders for early treatment and prevention of overt disease. Biobanks of stored DBS cards offer significant potential for biomedical research. Biobanking and secondary use of DBS cards also raise ethical and legal issues, particularly concerning the rights of parents and children. This study provides a comprehensive overview of legislation and legal practices governing DBS biobanking across 29 European countries, based on a survey conducted in collaboration with the International Society for Neonatal Screening. Findings reveal a highly heterogeneous landscape: 15 countries have national legislation, five have regional guidelines, and nine lack formal regulations. Only four countries require explicit parental consent for DBS storage, with considerable variation in approval processes for research use. A harmonization of practices, with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a basis for future regulation, supplemented by clearer guidance on ‘public interest’ and robust safeguards for individual rights may lead to more transparent and consistent governance, which is essential to balance scientific progress with the protection of parental and children’s rights in DBS-based research across Europe.
- 5 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Neonatal Screening
- Vol. 12 (3) , 64
Open AccessFeatures and Legal Practice of Dried Blood Spot Card Biobanking in Europe: Balancing Research Potential with Parental and Children’s Rights
Neonatal screening using Dried Blood Spot (DBS) cards is an important and successful public health facility in Europe, enabling early detection of congenital disorders for early treatment and prevention of overt disease. Biobanks of stored DBS cards offer significant potential for biomedical research. Biobanking and secondary use of DBS cards also raise ethical and legal issues, particularly concerning the rights of parents and children. This study provides a comprehensive overview of legislation and legal practices governing DBS biobanking across 29 European countries, based on a survey conducted in collaboration with the International Society for Neonatal Screening. Findings reveal a highly heterogeneous landscape: 15 countries have national legislation, five have regional guidelines, and nine lack formal regulations. Only four countries require explicit parental consent for DBS storage, with considerable variation in approval processes for research use. A harmonization of practices, with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a basis for future regulation, supplemented by clearer guidance on ‘public interest’ and robust safeguards for individual rights may lead to more transparent and consistent governance, which is essential to balance scientific progress with the protection of parental and children’s rights in DBS-based research across Europe.