Maram Fahad Almasri
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Maram Fahad Almasri has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Daliah Ali Alshehri
College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Ghadah Saad Alazmi
College of Dentistry, University of Ha’il, Ha’il 81481, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - KhaledMosfer Alzahrani
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Khalid Mohammed Alnajjar
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh 12734, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Lamia Yahya M. Alshowail
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin AbdulAziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Lulu Turki Alammar
College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint AbdulRahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Prosthesis
- Vol. 8 (8) , 84
The Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Color and Translucency of Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
Background/Objectives: To compare the effects of different surface treatments on the color and translucency of three types of zirconia ceramics. Methods: Ninety CAD/CAM-milled zirconia disks (10 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) were fabricated from Cercon HT (3-YTZP), IPS e.max ZirCAD MT (4-YTZP), and Cercon XT (5-YTZP). Baseline CIE Lab* coordinates were measured using a digital spectrophotometer. The disks underwent one of three surface treatments: 50 µm alumina air-particle abrasion (AAA), Zircos-E etching (ZE), or 100 µm glass bead air-particle abrasion (GBA). Post-treatment CIE Lab* measurements were obtained, and color change (ΔE00, CIEDE2000) and translucency change (ΔTP00) were calculated. Results: Regarding color change (ΔE00), 50 µm AAA produced the greatest change, followed by ZE, while GBA caused the smallest change. Surface treatment and its interaction with material type were found to exert a significant effect, whereas material type alone was not significant. Cercon XT showed the highest numerical ΔE00 value among the materials, although the difference was not statistically significant. All ΔE00 values were below the clinical acceptability threshold (00) after surface treatment. Baseline translucency values (TP00) differed significantly, with Cercon XT being the most translucent, followed by ZirCAD MT and Cercon HT, but these differences did not result in significant ΔTP00 changes post treatment. Conclusions: Surface treatments and their interaction with material type significantly affected zirconia color change, with 50 µm alumina air-particle abrasion producing the most pronounced effect. Material type alone did not significantly influence ΔE00, though Cercon XT showed the highest numerical value. Translucency change (ΔTP00) after treatment was unaffected by surface treatment or material–treatment interaction.
- 7 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Prosthesis
- Vol. 8 (8) , 84
Open AccessThe Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Color and Translucency of Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
Background/Objectives: To compare the effects of different surface treatments on the color and translucency of three types of zirconia ceramics. Methods: Ninety CAD/CAM-milled zirconia disks (10 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) were fabricated from Cercon HT (3-YTZP), IPS e.max ZirCAD MT (4-YTZP), and Cercon XT (5-YTZP). Baseline CIE Lab* coordinates were measured using a digital spectrophotometer. The disks underwent one of three surface treatments: 50 µm alumina air-particle abrasion (AAA), Zircos-E etching (ZE), or 100 µm glass bead air-particle abrasion (GBA). Post-treatment CIE Lab* measurements were obtained, and color change (ΔE00, CIEDE2000) and translucency change (ΔTP00) were calculated. Results: Regarding color change (ΔE00), 50 µm AAA produced the greatest change, followed by ZE, while GBA caused the smallest change. Surface treatment and its interaction with material type were found to exert a significant effect, whereas material type alone was not significant. Cercon XT showed the highest numerical ΔE00 value among the materials, although the difference was not statistically significant. All ΔE00 values were below the clinical acceptability threshold (00) after surface treatment. Baseline translucency values (TP00) differed significantly, with Cercon XT being the most translucent, followed by ZirCAD MT and Cercon HT, but these differences did not result in significant ΔTP00 changes post treatment. Conclusions: Surface treatments and their interaction with material type significantly affected zirconia color change, with 50 µm alumina air-particle abrasion producing the most pronounced effect. Material type alone did not significantly influence ΔE00, though Cercon XT showed the highest numerical value. Translucency change (ΔTP00) after treatment was unaffected by surface treatment or material–treatment interaction.