Tomas Novohradsky
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Tomas Novohradsky has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jachym Simsa
Department of Military Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
2 shared publications - Jan Malecek
Department of Military Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
2 shared publications - Michal Puncochar
Physical Training and Sport Centre, University of Defence, 662 10 Brno, Czech Republic
2 shared publications - Michal Vagner
Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
2 shared publications - Petr Stastny
Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
2 shared publications - Vaclav Zdrazila
Department of Military Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
A Contact-Integrated Impulse-Transfer Index for Front Kicks Under a Carried-Load Condition in Military Cadets
Effective mass reflects the body mass mechanically coupled during impact. Acceleration-based effective-mass estimates require noise-sensitive differentiation of segment kinematics. This study introduced a new operational index, the contact-integrated impulse-transfer index (ITI; the ratio of contact impulse to pre-impact foot velocity) and evaluated its reliability, agreement with an acceleration-based effective-mass estimate (Me,acc), and sensitivity to a carried-load condition. Forty male military cadets performed five maximal front kicks onto a force plate synchronized with three-dimensional motion capture under two fixed-order conditions: barefoot without load and with 30 kg of carried equipment. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients; condition differences using paired tests with effect sizes and false-discovery-rate correction; method agreement using correlations, ICCs, and Bland–Altman analysis; and isokinetic strength interactions using body-mass-adjusted mixed-effects models. ITI showed poor-to-moderate single-kick reliability (ICC = 0.46–0.52) but good reliability for the five-kick mean (ICC = 0.83–0.87). It was higher with than without the carried load (26.18 ± 5.20 vs. 21.72 ± 5.05 kg; p < 0.001; dz = 1.07), which, by definition, corresponded to a 23% greater net impulse with unchanged pre-impact foot velocity. Net impulse alone was more reliable (single-kick ICC = 0.75; five-kick mean ICC = 0.95) and showed a larger load effect (dz = 1.39) than ITI. Contact duration increased, peak force decreased, and the force–time profile appeared more push-like under load. In a subsample with usable impact-phase marker trajectories (n = 20), ITI and Me,acc were not significantly correlated (r = 0.06, p = 0.69) and showed negligible agreement (ICC = 0.01; Bland–Altman bias = −20.6 kg). The condition × strength interactions for concentric hip-rotator strength did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted p = 0.067–0.096). Averaged across repeated kicks, ITI is an index of impulse transfer rather than effective (inertial) mass; front kick assessment in soldiers should include representative military equipment, and the altered kick mechanics suggest that training should include it as well.
Open AccessA Contact-Integrated Impulse-Transfer Index for Front Kicks Under a Carried-Load Condition in Military Cadets
Effective mass reflects the body mass mechanically coupled during impact. Acceleration-based effective-mass estimates require noise-sensitive differentiation of segment kinematics. This study introduced a new operational index, the contact-integrated impulse-transfer index (ITI; the ratio of contact impulse to pre-impact foot velocity) and evaluated its reliability, agreement with an acceleration-based effective-mass estimate (Me,acc), and sensitivity to a carried-load condition. Forty male military cadets performed five maximal front kicks onto a force plate synchronized with three-dimensional motion capture under two fixed-order conditions: barefoot without load and with 30 kg of carried equipment. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients; condition differences using paired tests with effect sizes and false-discovery-rate correction; method agreement using correlations, ICCs, and Bland–Altman analysis; and isokinetic strength interactions using body-mass-adjusted mixed-effects models. ITI showed poor-to-moderate single-kick reliability (ICC = 0.46–0.52) but good reliability for the five-kick mean (ICC = 0.83–0.87). It was higher with than without the carried load (26.18 ± 5.20 vs. 21.72 ± 5.05 kg; p < 0.001; dz = 1.07), which, by definition, corresponded to a 23% greater net impulse with unchanged pre-impact foot velocity. Net impulse alone was more reliable (single-kick ICC = 0.75; five-kick mean ICC = 0.95) and showed a larger load effect (dz = 1.39) than ITI. Contact duration increased, peak force decreased, and the force–time profile appeared more push-like under load. In a subsample with usable impact-phase marker trajectories (n = 20), ITI and Me,acc were not significantly correlated (r = 0.06, p = 0.69) and showed negligible agreement (ICC = 0.01; Bland–Altman bias = −20.6 kg). The condition × strength interactions for concentric hip-rotator strength did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted p = 0.067–0.096). Averaged across repeated kicks, ITI is an index of impulse transfer rather than effective (inertial) mass; front kick assessment in soldiers should include representative military equipment, and the altered kick mechanics suggest that training should include it as well.
- Open Access
- 7 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
An Impulse-Based Effective Mass Estimate Is Sensitive to a Carried-Load Condition During Front Kicks in Military Cadets
Effective mass reflects the body mass mechanically coupled during impact. Acceleration-based effective-mass estimates require noise-sensitive differentiation of segment kinematics. This study introduced an impulse-based estimate (Me,imp = J/vpre) and evaluated its reliability, agreement with an acceleration-based estimate (Me,acc), and sensitivity to a carried-load condition. Forty male military cadets performed five maximal front kicks onto a force plate synchronized with three-dimensional motion capture under two fixed-order conditions: barefoot without load (NL) and with 30 kg of carried equipment (WL). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients; condition differences using paired tests with effect sizes and FDR correction; method agreement using correlations, ICCs, and Bland–Altman analysis; and isokinetic strength interactions using body-mass-adjusted mixed-effects models. Me,imp showed poor-to-moderate single-kick reliability but good reliability for the five-kick mean (ICC = 0.84–0.87). It was higher in WL than NL (25.95 ± 5.44 vs. 21.89 ± 5.14 kg; p < 0.001; dz = 0.92), reflecting a 21% greater net impulse, while pre-impact foot velocity (vpre) remained unchanged. Contact duration increased and the force–time profile became more push-like under WL. In a subsample with usable impact-phase marker trajectories (n = 20), Me,imp and Me,acc were not significantly correlated (r = 0.10, p = 0.54) and showed negligible agreement (ICC = 0.02; Bland–Altman bias = −21.5 kg). Stronger concentric hip rotators were associated with a smaller WL–NL increase in Me,imp (Bonferroni-adjusted p = 0.044–0.050). Me,imp should be interpreted as a contact-integrated index of impulse-transfer capacity, reliable when averaged across repeated kicks, rather than as true inertial mass or an interchangeable substitute for Me,acc.
- 7 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessAn Impulse-Based Effective Mass Estimate Is Sensitive to a Carried-Load Condition During Front Kicks in Military Cadets
Effective mass reflects the body mass mechanically coupled during impact. Acceleration-based effective-mass estimates require noise-sensitive differentiation of segment kinematics. This study introduced an impulse-based estimate (Me,imp = J/vpre) and evaluated its reliability, agreement with an acceleration-based estimate (Me,acc), and sensitivity to a carried-load condition. Forty male military cadets performed five maximal front kicks onto a force plate synchronized with three-dimensional motion capture under two fixed-order conditions: barefoot without load (NL) and with 30 kg of carried equipment (WL). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients; condition differences using paired tests with effect sizes and FDR correction; method agreement using correlations, ICCs, and Bland–Altman analysis; and isokinetic strength interactions using body-mass-adjusted mixed-effects models. Me,imp showed poor-to-moderate single-kick reliability but good reliability for the five-kick mean (ICC = 0.84–0.87). It was higher in WL than NL (25.95 ± 5.44 vs. 21.89 ± 5.14 kg; p < 0.001; dz = 0.92), reflecting a 21% greater net impulse, while pre-impact foot velocity (vpre) remained unchanged. Contact duration increased and the force–time profile became more push-like under WL. In a subsample with usable impact-phase marker trajectories (n = 20), Me,imp and Me,acc were not significantly correlated (r = 0.10, p = 0.54) and showed negligible agreement (ICC = 0.02; Bland–Altman bias = −21.5 kg). Stronger concentric hip rotators were associated with a smaller WL–NL increase in Me,imp (Bonferroni-adjusted p = 0.044–0.050). Me,imp should be interpreted as a contact-integrated index of impulse-transfer capacity, reliable when averaged across repeated kicks, rather than as true inertial mass or an interchangeable substitute for Me,acc.