Andreas von der Heidt
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Andreas von der Heidt has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Albert Amberger
Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication - Christina Lutz-Nicoladoni
Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication - Esther Schamschula
Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication - Hannes Dapoz
Tyrolpath Obrist Brunhuber GmbH, 6511 Zams, Austria
1 shared publication - Heidi Fiegl
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication - Johannes Zschocke
Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 16 (8) , 1200
The Tyrolean Founder MLH1 Variant c.836T>G Causes Lynch Syndrome Due to a Leaky Splice Effect
The identification of a pathogenic variant (PV) in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes confirms the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS). Hence, the correct classification of MMR gene variants is of utmost importance for appropriate counselling, surveillance, and treatment of LS patients and their families. In 7/200 unrelated Tyrolean-suspected LS patients, we identified the rare variant MLH1:c.836T>G. Clinical and tumor data strongly indicate that this founder variant is associated with an increased risk for early-onset LS-associated tumors. We also demonstrate that the variant leads to aberrant mRNA splicing. However, the splice effect’s leakiness together with the small effect of the amino acid change p.(Val297Gly) encoded by the residual full-length transcripts in a functional assay preclude its formal classification as (likely) PV according to internationally accepted variant interpretation guidelines. The family histories of the carriers suggest that the obstacles to classify the variant as (likely) PV may be related with a reduced penetrance. Nonetheless, and despite the formal classification of MLH1:c.836T>G as a variant of uncertain significance, we show that carriers should undergo cancer surveillance and predictive testing should be offered to relatives. This variant illustrates the need for an improved classification framework for appropriate categorization of lower-penetrance alleles.
- 17 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 16 (8) , 1200
Open AccessThe Tyrolean Founder MLH1 Variant c.836T>G Causes Lynch Syndrome Due to a Leaky Splice Effect
The identification of a pathogenic variant (PV) in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes confirms the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS). Hence, the correct classification of MMR gene variants is of utmost importance for appropriate counselling, surveillance, and treatment of LS patients and their families. In 7/200 unrelated Tyrolean-suspected LS patients, we identified the rare variant MLH1:c.836T>G. Clinical and tumor data strongly indicate that this founder variant is associated with an increased risk for early-onset LS-associated tumors. We also demonstrate that the variant leads to aberrant mRNA splicing. However, the splice effect’s leakiness together with the small effect of the amino acid change p.(Val297Gly) encoded by the residual full-length transcripts in a functional assay preclude its formal classification as (likely) PV according to internationally accepted variant interpretation guidelines. The family histories of the carriers suggest that the obstacles to classify the variant as (likely) PV may be related with a reduced penetrance. Nonetheless, and despite the formal classification of MLH1:c.836T>G as a variant of uncertain significance, we show that carriers should undergo cancer surveillance and predictive testing should be offered to relatives. This variant illustrates the need for an improved classification framework for appropriate categorization of lower-penetrance alleles.