Danilo Alejandro Solarte Ordoñez
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Danilo Alejandro Solarte Ordoñez has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ana Gabriela Cruz Suarez
Emergency Department, Fundación Hospital San Pedro, Pasto 520003, Nariño, Colombia
1 shared publication - Angela Catalina Vallejo Cajigas
Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño, Pasto 520001, Nariño, Colombia
1 shared publication - Angie Estefanía Arcos Bastidas
Semillero de Investigación AMEC, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Campus Pasto, Pasto 520001, Nariño, Colombia
1 shared publication - Cesar Bonilla
Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14001, Peru
1 shared publication - Darío Sebastián López Delgado
Interdisciplinary Research Group in Health-Disease (GIISE), Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Pasto, Nariño, Colombia
1 shared publication - Harold Enrique Vasquez Ucros
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Pasto 520002, Colombia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (16) , 6496
Acute Ischemic Stroke in 2026: From Time to Penumbra—An Updated Narrative Review of Reperfusion Strategies with a Latin American Implementation Perspective
Background/Objective: The management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has evolved from rigid time-based treatment paradigms toward tissue-based selection guided by advanced neuroimaging, thereby expanding eligibility for reperfusion therapies. To provide an updated narrative review of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) classification and management, with emphasis on extended therapeutic windows for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT), bridging strategies, posterior circulation stroke, and implementation challenges in Latin America and other resource-constrained settings. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and LILACS databases, covering the period from 2013 to 2025. Results: Sixty-three studies were selected from 412 records and categorized into etiologic classification, extended-window thrombolysis, EVT and bridging therapy, and posterior circulation stroke. Current evidence supports imaging-guided IVT beyond 4.5 h and EVT up to 24 h in selected patients with salvageable brain tissue, including some individuals with large infarct cores. Recent trials also support EVT for basilar artery occlusion. Tenecteplase offers practical workflow advantages in many centers, particularly where transfer delays and limited access to advanced imaging constrain timely reperfusion decisions. Conclusions: Contemporary AIS management is increasingly guided by pathophysiology and imaging rather than strict time thresholds. However, improving outcomes in middle- and low-income settings requires the implementation of adapted clinical algorithms, strengthening of stroke care networks, and optimization of referral pathways.
- 21 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (16) , 6496
Open AccessAcute Ischemic Stroke in 2026: From Time to Penumbra—An Updated Narrative Review of Reperfusion Strategies with a Latin American Implementation Perspective
Background/Objective: The management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has evolved from rigid time-based treatment paradigms toward tissue-based selection guided by advanced neuroimaging, thereby expanding eligibility for reperfusion therapies. To provide an updated narrative review of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) classification and management, with emphasis on extended therapeutic windows for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT), bridging strategies, posterior circulation stroke, and implementation challenges in Latin America and other resource-constrained settings. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and LILACS databases, covering the period from 2013 to 2025. Results: Sixty-three studies were selected from 412 records and categorized into etiologic classification, extended-window thrombolysis, EVT and bridging therapy, and posterior circulation stroke. Current evidence supports imaging-guided IVT beyond 4.5 h and EVT up to 24 h in selected patients with salvageable brain tissue, including some individuals with large infarct cores. Recent trials also support EVT for basilar artery occlusion. Tenecteplase offers practical workflow advantages in many centers, particularly where transfer delays and limited access to advanced imaging constrain timely reperfusion decisions. Conclusions: Contemporary AIS management is increasingly guided by pathophysiology and imaging rather than strict time thresholds. However, improving outcomes in middle- and low-income settings requires the implementation of adapted clinical algorithms, strengthening of stroke care networks, and optimization of referral pathways.