Lin Gui
Research Subjects
Lin Gui has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Feiyang Yu
School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
1 shared publication - Huijiu Wang
Bull Group Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315000, China
1 shared publication - Junqi Mai
School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
1 shared publication - Junwen Wang
School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
1 shared publication - Limin Yang
Bull Group Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315000, China
1 shared publication - Shijing Wu
School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
A Mechanism-Oriented Multiphysics Study of Scratch-Width-Dependent Galvanic Protection Loss in Mechanically Damaged Hot-Dip Galvanized Steel Enclosures
Mechanical scratches that penetrate the protective layers expose the steel substrate and establish a zinc–steel galvanic couple beneath an electrolyte film. This study develops a mechanism-oriented multiphysics model of scratch-width-dependent galvanic protection loss in hot-dip galvanized (HDG) steel enclosures. The model couples Butler–Volmer interfacial kinetics with equilibrium potentials related through the Nernst framework, Nernst–Planck transport of Zn2+, OH−, Na+, Cl−, and dissolved O2, electrolyte charge conservation, reaction-derived boundary fluxes, a simplified corrosion-product deposition and transport-resistance treatment, and level-set tracking of interface evolution. Numerical field cases at scratch widths of 1, 3, and 5 mm show that widening the scratch increases the exposed-steel cathodic demand and lengthens the ionic-current path from the zinc edges to the scratch center. The resulting ohmic drop reduces the protective current and permits local iron dissolution when the center can no longer be maintained at a sufficiently negative potential. NSS morphology, cross-sectional SEM/EDS, corrosion-depth trends, and XRD observations show qualitative consistency with this mechanism. Under the investigated NSS conditions, a marked descriptive change occurs between the experimentally sampled widths of 2 and 3 mm, with 3 mm representing the first sampled condition showing pronounced protection loss. Because replicate-level corrosion-depth data and independent electrochemical measurements are unavailable, no statistical significance or quantitative model validation is claimed.
Open AccessA Mechanism-Oriented Multiphysics Study of Scratch-Width-Dependent Galvanic Protection Loss in Mechanically Damaged Hot-Dip Galvanized Steel Enclosures
Mechanical scratches that penetrate the protective layers expose the steel substrate and establish a zinc–steel galvanic couple beneath an electrolyte film. This study develops a mechanism-oriented multiphysics model of scratch-width-dependent galvanic protection loss in hot-dip galvanized (HDG) steel enclosures. The model couples Butler–Volmer interfacial kinetics with equilibrium potentials related through the Nernst framework, Nernst–Planck transport of Zn2+, OH−, Na+, Cl−, and dissolved O2, electrolyte charge conservation, reaction-derived boundary fluxes, a simplified corrosion-product deposition and transport-resistance treatment, and level-set tracking of interface evolution. Numerical field cases at scratch widths of 1, 3, and 5 mm show that widening the scratch increases the exposed-steel cathodic demand and lengthens the ionic-current path from the zinc edges to the scratch center. The resulting ohmic drop reduces the protective current and permits local iron dissolution when the center can no longer be maintained at a sufficiently negative potential. NSS morphology, cross-sectional SEM/EDS, corrosion-depth trends, and XRD observations show qualitative consistency with this mechanism. Under the investigated NSS conditions, a marked descriptive change occurs between the experimentally sampled widths of 2 and 3 mm, with 3 mm representing the first sampled condition showing pronounced protection loss. Because replicate-level corrosion-depth data and independent electrochemical measurements are unavailable, no statistical significance or quantitative model validation is claimed.