Hugo Abritta Reis
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Hugo Abritta Reis has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alan Roger Santos-Silva
Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
1 shared publication - André Carlos Ponce Leon Ferreira de Carvalho
Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
1 shared publication - Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, SP, Brazil
1 shared publication - Ayrton da Costa Ganem Filho
Institute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences of University of São Paulo (ICMC‐USP) São Paulo Brazil
1 shared publication - Cristina Saldivia‐Siracusa
Departamento de Diagnóstico Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP‐UNICAMP) Piracicaba São Paulo Brazil
1 shared publication - Felipe Paiva Fonseca
Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 August 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
- Vol. 55 (9) , 1073-1080
EffiSegNet : Advances in Automated Segmentation of Actinic Cheilitis and Lip Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Clinical Photographs
Background: Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a potentially malignant oral disorder linked to lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Clinical diagnosis is hindered by lesion heterogeneity. While AI tools have shown promise in oral lesion detection and diagnosis, image segmentation remains underexplored. This study developed and externally validated a deep learning segmentation model for digital photographs of lip lesions. Methods: A total of 489 clinical photographs from one institution were used for training/internal testing, and 82 external images from two independent institutions (UFPB and UFMG) served as external validation. EffiSegNet‑B0 used Image Net‑pretrained EfficientNet‑B0 encoder, with stage features aggregated via Ghost Modules. Manual segmentation masks comprised the clinically affected lip region and were used as ground truth. Performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity (recall), precision, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU). Results: The model achieved high accuracy (> 95%) on both internal and external datasets. DSCs were 0.888 (95% CI: 0.871–0.904) for internal test and 0.875 (95% CI: 0.862–0.888) for external validation, while IoU values were 0.802 (95% CI: 0.777–0.828) and 0.782 (95% CI: 0.763–0.801), respectively. No performance decline was observed on external validation data. The model remained robust to lesion variations (ulceration, crusting, and keratinization). Conclusion: EffiSegNet‐B0 demonstrated high accuracy and adaptability in segmenting lip lesions, reinforcing its potential for clinical image analysis applications. The proposed model generalizes well across different institutions and lesion phenotypes, consistently extracting the complete region of interest. This proof‐of‐concept study supports its promise as a tool for automated lip lesion segmentation in heterogeneous clinical settings.
- 23 August 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
- Vol. 55 (9) , 1073-1080
Open AccessEffiSegNet : Advances in Automated Segmentation of Actinic Cheilitis and Lip Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Clinical Photographs
Background: Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a potentially malignant oral disorder linked to lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Clinical diagnosis is hindered by lesion heterogeneity. While AI tools have shown promise in oral lesion detection and diagnosis, image segmentation remains underexplored. This study developed and externally validated a deep learning segmentation model for digital photographs of lip lesions. Methods: A total of 489 clinical photographs from one institution were used for training/internal testing, and 82 external images from two independent institutions (UFPB and UFMG) served as external validation. EffiSegNet‑B0 used Image Net‑pretrained EfficientNet‑B0 encoder, with stage features aggregated via Ghost Modules. Manual segmentation masks comprised the clinically affected lip region and were used as ground truth. Performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity (recall), precision, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU). Results: The model achieved high accuracy (> 95%) on both internal and external datasets. DSCs were 0.888 (95% CI: 0.871–0.904) for internal test and 0.875 (95% CI: 0.862–0.888) for external validation, while IoU values were 0.802 (95% CI: 0.777–0.828) and 0.782 (95% CI: 0.763–0.801), respectively. No performance decline was observed on external validation data. The model remained robust to lesion variations (ulceration, crusting, and keratinization). Conclusion: EffiSegNet‐B0 demonstrated high accuracy and adaptability in segmenting lip lesions, reinforcing its potential for clinical image analysis applications. The proposed model generalizes well across different institutions and lesion phenotypes, consistently extracting the complete region of interest. This proof‐of‐concept study supports its promise as a tool for automated lip lesion segmentation in heterogeneous clinical settings.