Yue Liu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Yue Liu has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Fuqiang Xu
State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, Wuhan Center for Magnetic Resonance, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
1 shared publication - Jie Wang
Department of Neurology, Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication - Li Wang
School of Medicine, Jingchu University of Technology, Jingmen 448000, China
1 shared publication - Liping Wang
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Viral Vectors for Biomedicine, Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
1 shared publication - Pengjie Wen
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Viral Vectors for Biomedicine, Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
1 shared publication - Qing Liu
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Seizure-Inducible Risks of In Vivo Optogenetic Manipulations
Optogenetic manipulation is pivotal in basic neuroscience research and in studying neuropsychiatric disorders, enabling the activation or inhibition of neuronal populations with millisecond precision. However, this technique can induce artificial neuronal hypersynchronization that is rarely observed under physiological conditions. Given that epileptic seizures arise from abnormally synchronized neuronal discharges, the potential for optogenetic stimulation to trigger seizures and confound experimental outcomes warrants close examination. Here, using electrophysiological and behavioral recordings, we demonstrate that even single-trial optogenetic stimulation of CaMKII-positive neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region, anterior piriform cortex (APC), or lateral/medial entorhinal cortex (LEnt or MEnt) can induce seizure-like discharges and behaviors in adult male C57BL/6 mice. Repeated stimulation in the APC, LEnt, or MEnt elicited more severe seizure-like activity. Furthermore, stimulation protocols characterized by high power, long duration, high frequency, and medium pulse width were more prone to inducing such events. Additionally, we found that CA1 stimulation could impair subsequent contextual fear memory. These findings provide critical cautions and practical guidelines for the design and implementation of in vivo optogenetic experiments in neuroscience research.
Open AccessSeizure-Inducible Risks of In Vivo Optogenetic Manipulations
Optogenetic manipulation is pivotal in basic neuroscience research and in studying neuropsychiatric disorders, enabling the activation or inhibition of neuronal populations with millisecond precision. However, this technique can induce artificial neuronal hypersynchronization that is rarely observed under physiological conditions. Given that epileptic seizures arise from abnormally synchronized neuronal discharges, the potential for optogenetic stimulation to trigger seizures and confound experimental outcomes warrants close examination. Here, using electrophysiological and behavioral recordings, we demonstrate that even single-trial optogenetic stimulation of CaMKII-positive neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region, anterior piriform cortex (APC), or lateral/medial entorhinal cortex (LEnt or MEnt) can induce seizure-like discharges and behaviors in adult male C57BL/6 mice. Repeated stimulation in the APC, LEnt, or MEnt elicited more severe seizure-like activity. Furthermore, stimulation protocols characterized by high power, long duration, high frequency, and medium pulse width were more prone to inducing such events. Additionally, we found that CA1 stimulation could impair subsequent contextual fear memory. These findings provide critical cautions and practical guidelines for the design and implementation of in vivo optogenetic experiments in neuroscience research.