Torrey Chisari
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Torrey Chisari has a total of 37 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ingo Helbig
Center for Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ENDD), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 shared publications - Jillian L. McKee
Center for Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ENDD), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 shared publications - Michael J. Boland
Center for Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ENDD), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 shared publications - Sarah McKeown Ruggiero
Center for Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ENDD), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 shared publications - Anna Jenne Prentice
Center for Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
2 shared publications - Benjamin L. Prosser
Department of Physiology, Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (B.L.P.).
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 December 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology Genetics
- Vol. 12 (6) , e200439
Quantification of Neuromotor Control in STXBP1 -Related Disorders With Wearable Sensors
Background and ObjectivesSTXBP1-related disorders (STXBP1-RD) are a spectrum of neurodevelopmental conditions that present with motor impairments, which include involuntary movements, ataxia, and t...
- 1 December 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology Genetics
- Vol. 12 (6) , e200439
Open AccessQuantification of Neuromotor Control in STXBP1 -Related Disorders With Wearable Sensors
Background and ObjectivesSTXBP1-related disorders (STXBP1-RD) are a spectrum of neurodevelopmental conditions that present with motor impairments, which include involuntary movements, ataxia, and t...
- Open Access
Functional profiling of STXBP1 missense variants using a novel dual‐readout fluorometric assay
Objective: STXBP1 ‐related disorders ( STXBP1 ‐RD) are among the most common genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, marked by early onset epilepsy, global developmental delay, and motor impairments. Many missense variants remain uncharacterized, limiting accurate variant interpretation and hindering development of precision therapies. Current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) variant curation frameworks provide limited discriminatory power for STXBP1 missense variants due to limited functional data and frequently incomplete parental testing, leaving a substantial proportion of variants classified as variants of uncertain significance. Methods: We developed a fluorometric assay that leverages split fluorescence complementation to simultaneously measure STXBP1 protein stability and its binding affinity to a primary interaction partner, syntaxin‐1A (STX1A), including genetically engineered closed and open STX1A conformations, which are essential for SNARE complex function. Using this platform, we evaluated five benign variants, six pathogenic variants, and four variants that result in an atypically mild clinical presentation. Results: Benign population variants showed minimal effects on stability or binding, whereas known pathogenic variants consistently demonstrated reduced protein stability and diminished binding to STX1A, with some exhibiting STX1A conformation‐specific binding deficits. Variants associated with atypically mild phenotypes displayed intermediate, variant‐specific profiles. To quantify discriminatory performance, we developed and trained an exploratory support vector machine classifier using stability and binding metrics. With the exception of a single STXBP1 variant in an individual with a mild clinical presentation, the model correctly classified benign and pathogenic variants using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. For variants with available clinical data, classifier scores showed a statistically significant correlation with clinical severity. Significance: Together, these findings demonstrate that a scalable, quantitative assay capturing STXBP1 stability and syntaxin‐binding behavior can differentiate benign from pathogenic variants and provide functional insights into mechanisms of pathogenicity. This platform offers a path toward improved variant interpretation, supports refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria for synaptic disorders, and may inform future therapeutic targeting strategies for STXBP1 ‐RD.
Open AccessFunctional profiling of STXBP1 missense variants using a novel dual‐readout fluorometric assay
Objective: STXBP1 ‐related disorders ( STXBP1 ‐RD) are among the most common genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, marked by early onset epilepsy, global developmental delay, and motor impairments. Many missense variants remain uncharacterized, limiting accurate variant interpretation and hindering development of precision therapies. Current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) variant curation frameworks provide limited discriminatory power for STXBP1 missense variants due to limited functional data and frequently incomplete parental testing, leaving a substantial proportion of variants classified as variants of uncertain significance. Methods: We developed a fluorometric assay that leverages split fluorescence complementation to simultaneously measure STXBP1 protein stability and its binding affinity to a primary interaction partner, syntaxin‐1A (STX1A), including genetically engineered closed and open STX1A conformations, which are essential for SNARE complex function. Using this platform, we evaluated five benign variants, six pathogenic variants, and four variants that result in an atypically mild clinical presentation. Results: Benign population variants showed minimal effects on stability or binding, whereas known pathogenic variants consistently demonstrated reduced protein stability and diminished binding to STX1A, with some exhibiting STX1A conformation‐specific binding deficits. Variants associated with atypically mild phenotypes displayed intermediate, variant‐specific profiles. To quantify discriminatory performance, we developed and trained an exploratory support vector machine classifier using stability and binding metrics. With the exception of a single STXBP1 variant in an individual with a mild clinical presentation, the model correctly classified benign and pathogenic variants using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. For variants with available clinical data, classifier scores showed a statistically significant correlation with clinical severity. Significance: Together, these findings demonstrate that a scalable, quantitative assay capturing STXBP1 stability and syntaxin‐binding behavior can differentiate benign from pathogenic variants and provide functional insights into mechanisms of pathogenicity. This platform offers a path toward improved variant interpretation, supports refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria for synaptic disorders, and may inform future therapeutic targeting strategies for STXBP1 ‐RD.
- Open Access
Feasibility and Validity of Clinical Outcome Measures in a Prospective Natural History Study of STXBP1 -Related Disorders
Aims: To describe the developmental phenotype of individuals with STXBP1 -related disorders ( STXBP1 -RD) in a prospective natural history study using standardized outcome measures. Methods: Data were collected from 155 individuals with a mean age of 8.2 years. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Fourth Edition (Bayley-4), Hand Manipulation and Eye Hand Coordination subtests of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Third Edition (PDMS-3), and Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) were assessed. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Mini-Manual Ability Classification System (MiniMACS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), and Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) were used to classify participants. Results: Assessments were well tolerated with 0-6.9% incomplete assessments. Floor or ceiling effects were not common with raw scores, age equivalents, or growth scales values but were frequently observed with scaled scores. Significant differences were found between the Bayley-4, GMFM-66, and PDMS-3 when participants were divided into groups by corresponding developmental domain classification scale. Strong associations ( p <.05) were seen between all measures across Bayley-4 domains, PDMS-3 domains, and GMFM-66 total scores. Interpretation: The Bayley-4, GMFM-66, and PDMS-3 are suitable for use in clinical practice and future clinical trials in STXBP1 -RD.
Open AccessFeasibility and Validity of Clinical Outcome Measures in a Prospective Natural History Study of STXBP1 -Related Disorders
Aims: To describe the developmental phenotype of individuals with STXBP1 -related disorders ( STXBP1 -RD) in a prospective natural history study using standardized outcome measures. Methods: Data were collected from 155 individuals with a mean age of 8.2 years. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Fourth Edition (Bayley-4), Hand Manipulation and Eye Hand Coordination subtests of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Third Edition (PDMS-3), and Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) were assessed. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Mini-Manual Ability Classification System (MiniMACS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), and Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) were used to classify participants. Results: Assessments were well tolerated with 0-6.9% incomplete assessments. Floor or ceiling effects were not common with raw scores, age equivalents, or growth scales values but were frequently observed with scaled scores. Significant differences were found between the Bayley-4, GMFM-66, and PDMS-3 when participants were divided into groups by corresponding developmental domain classification scale. Strong associations ( p <.05) were seen between all measures across Bayley-4 domains, PDMS-3 domains, and GMFM-66 total scores. Interpretation: The Bayley-4, GMFM-66, and PDMS-3 are suitable for use in clinical practice and future clinical trials in STXBP1 -RD.