CGChristine Groves

Christine Groves

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Christine Groves has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Experimental characterisation of supersonic steam ejectors for geothermal applications: An analytical model comparison

    by Ximena Guardia, Christine Groves, Hugo Quinteros, Nursanty Banjarnahor, Yonatan Afework Tesfahunegn, Gudrun Saevarsdottir, Maria Gudjonsdottir

  • Open Access

    Field-Validated Two-Phase CFD Modelling of a Utility-Scale Geothermal Steam Ejector: Operational Boundaries and Performance Scaling

    by Ximena Guardia Muguruza, Christine Groves, Yonatan Afework Tesfahunegn, Gudrun Arnbjorg Saevarsdottir, Maria Sigridur Gudjonsdottir

    Supersonic ejectors offer a promising solution for extending low-pressure well life and increasing total power output in geothermal plants by entraining low-pressure fluid using a high-pressure primary flow. While steam supersonic ejectors are widely used in industrial applications such as refrigeration, their deployment in geothermal power generation remains largely unexplored, leaving a critical gap in field-validated numerical models for utility-scale two-phase systems. To address this, this study presents a 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) framework validated against industrial-scale field tests conducted at the Theistareykir Geothermal Power Plant in Iceland (connecting wells ThG-11 and ThG-15). Four RANS turbulence models (Standard k−ε, RNG k−ε, Realizable k−ε, and k−ω) were evaluated in ANSYS Fluent using a homogeneous Eulerian wet-steam formulation. The Realizable k−ε model demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving the lowest absolute error (6.4%) against field data. While non-equilibrium thermodynamic relaxation caused a systematic 8.9–12.6% overprediction in primary motive flow, secondary entrainment predictions closely tracked physical performance, with entrainment ratio errors reaching 0.00% under stable operation. Crucially, the model identifies operational boundaries: while field data places the physical backflow limit at an inlet pressure ratio of 2.2 (9.9bar difference), numerical divergence near zero-entrainment establishes a conservative modelling threshold at 2.6. By defining these physical and numerical limits while quantifying nozzle-sizing safety margins, this work provides a verified benchmark for scaling up CFD models for full-capacity geothermal ejector networks.