CGChristine Groves
Christine Groves
*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Christine Groves has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Gudrun Saevarsdottir
Department of Engineering, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
2 shared publications - Maria Gudjonsdottir
Reykjavik University
2 shared publications - Ximena Guardia
Ingeniería de la Energía, Universidad de Ingeniería y Tecnología (UTEC), Lima 15063, Peru
2 shared publications - Yonatan Afework Tesfahunegn
Department of Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
2 shared publications Hugo Quinteros
1 shared publication- Nursanty Banjarnahor1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 4 November 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Geothermics
- Vol. 143
Experimental characterisation of supersonic steam ejectors for geothermal applications: An analytical model comparison
- 4 November 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Geothermics
- Vol. 143
Experimental characterisation of supersonic steam ejectors for geothermal applications: An analytical model comparison
- Open Access
Field-Validated Two-Phase CFD Modelling of a Utility-Scale Geothermal Steam Ejector: Operational Boundaries and Performance Scaling
Supersonic ejectors offer a promising solution for extending low-pressure well life and increasing total power output in geothermal plants by entraining low-pressure fluid using a high-pressure primary flow. While steam supersonic ejectors are widely used in industrial applications such as refrigeration, their deployment in geothermal power generation remains largely unexplored, leaving a critical gap in field-validated numerical models for utility-scale two-phase systems. To address this, this study presents a 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) framework validated against industrial-scale field tests conducted at the Theistareykir Geothermal Power Plant in Iceland (connecting wells ThG-11 and ThG-15). Four RANS turbulence models (Standard , RNG , Realizable , and ) were evaluated in ANSYS Fluent using a homogeneous Eulerian wet-steam formulation. The Realizable model demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving the lowest absolute error (6.4%) against field data. While non-equilibrium thermodynamic relaxation caused a systematic 8.9–12.6% overprediction in primary motive flow, secondary entrainment predictions closely tracked physical performance, with entrainment ratio errors reaching 0.00% under stable operation. Crucially, the model identifies operational boundaries: while field data places the physical backflow limit at an inlet pressure ratio of ( difference), numerical divergence near zero-entrainment establishes a conservative modelling threshold at . By defining these physical and numerical limits while quantifying nozzle-sizing safety margins, this work provides a verified benchmark for scaling up CFD models for full-capacity geothermal ejector networks.Open AccessField-Validated Two-Phase CFD Modelling of a Utility-Scale Geothermal Steam Ejector: Operational Boundaries and Performance Scaling
Supersonic ejectors offer a promising solution for extending low-pressure well life and increasing total power output in geothermal plants by entraining low-pressure fluid using a high-pressure primary flow. While steam supersonic ejectors are widely used in industrial applications such as refrigeration, their deployment in geothermal power generation remains largely unexplored, leaving a critical gap in field-validated numerical models for utility-scale two-phase systems. To address this, this study presents a 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) framework validated against industrial-scale field tests conducted at the Theistareykir Geothermal Power Plant in Iceland (connecting wells ThG-11 and ThG-15). Four RANS turbulence models (Standard , RNG , Realizable , and ) were evaluated in ANSYS Fluent using a homogeneous Eulerian wet-steam formulation. The Realizable model demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving the lowest absolute error (6.4%) against field data. While non-equilibrium thermodynamic relaxation caused a systematic 8.9–12.6% overprediction in primary motive flow, secondary entrainment predictions closely tracked physical performance, with entrainment ratio errors reaching 0.00% under stable operation. Crucially, the model identifies operational boundaries: while field data places the physical backflow limit at an inlet pressure ratio of ( difference), numerical divergence near zero-entrainment establishes a conservative modelling threshold at . By defining these physical and numerical limits while quantifying nozzle-sizing safety margins, this work provides a verified benchmark for scaling up CFD models for full-capacity geothermal ejector networks.